-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 704
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add autogen-includes field #6037
Conversation
Pro-tip: you can now use the Draft PR feature instead of this. |
Are CI performed on draft PRs? https://github.blog/2019-02-14-introducing-draft-pull-requests/ doesn't mention, |
Yes they are.
Excerpts from Oleg Grenrus's message of 2019-05-07 14:38:17 +0000:
… Are CI performed on draft PRs? https://github.blog/2019-02-14-introducing-draft-pull-requests/ doesn't mention,
|
8800ec5
to
4dd2c29
Compare
25c7b63
to
428279b
Compare
Ready for review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm (barring a minor grammatical issue)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM modulo minor comments.
8f31086
to
400a936
Compare
autogen-includes aren't searched nor packages by `sdist`. This is relatively small code patch, but there are - change in file-format - short documentation of the field - `cabal check` - test-suite noise due new field in `BuildInfo`
Fixes #5223
Doesn't #5169
Please include the following checklist in your PR:
[ci skip]
is used to avoid triggering the build bots.Please also shortly describe how you tested your change. Bonus points for added tests!