Migrate tfe_organization_run_task to plugin model

[glennsarti]

Description

Requires #1291 to be merged first

This commit migrates the tfe_organization_run_task resource to the newer
plugin model. It uses a schema v0 as there is no difference in schema.

Later changes will migrate the other resource and data source objects.

As this is a no-op as far as customer changes go, no changelog is required.

Testing plan

1. This should be a noop. so all acceptance and unit tests will pass.

Manually tested

• Create a tfe_resource_run_task resource with the existing provider
• Then re-run terraform plan using the newer version, which includes this PR
• Note that no state changes will be present. Again, this should be a noop

External links

N/A

Output from acceptance tests

Local testing...

?   	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-tfe/internal/provider/validators	[no test files]
=== RUN   TestAccTFEOrganizationRunTaskDataSource_basic
2024/03/18 14:25:51 [DEBUG] Configuring client for host "REDACTED"
2024/03/18 14:25:51 [WARN] Unable to read CLI config or credentials file REDACTED: open REDACTED: no such file or directory
2024/03/18 14:25:51 [DEBUG] Service discovery for REDACTED
--- PASS: TestAccTFEOrganizationRunTaskDataSource_basic (8.34s)
=== RUN   TestAccTFEOrganizationRunTask_validateSchemaAttributeUrl
--- PASS: TestAccTFEOrganizationRunTask_validateSchemaAttributeUrl (0.24s)
=== RUN   TestAccTFEOrganizationRunTask_create
--- PASS: TestAccTFEOrganizationRunTask_create (9.24s)
=== RUN   TestAccTFEOrganizationRunTask_import
--- PASS: TestAccTFEOrganizationRunTask_import (6.90s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-tfe/internal/provider	25.378s

[brandonc]

Thanks for migrating this resource to the framework! This is the first time I've had to review a simple sdk -> framework migration and you made it really easy.

Shout out @ctrombley for the pair code review

[glennsarti]

@brandonc and @ctrombley Fixed up the PR as per comments and I also noticed that the resource import was completely removed (Whoops). I put that back in. Although I am tad concerned that the CI tests didn't pick that up. My testing did.

[glennsarti]

Although I am tad concerned that the CI tests didn't pick that up. My testing did.

Found it. GHA was using the wrong variable name. Fixed it.

[glennsarti]

I've found too many errors in the acceptance testing and moved them all to #1291. Blocked this PR in the mean time

[glennsarti]

@brandonc This is back ready for review

[brandonc]

Well done