Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ui] Time-based scheduling for tasks #20597

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 22, 2024

Conversation

philrenaud
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 15, 2024

Ember Test Audit comparison

main a96c58f change
passes 1559 1562 +3
failures 0 0 0
flaky 0 0 0
duration 11m 20s 519ms 11m 27s 221ms +06s 702ms

@tgross tgross added the stage/needs-rebase This PR needs to be rebased on main before it can be backported to pick up new BPA workflows label May 17, 2024
@philrenaud philrenaud marked this pull request as ready for review May 22, 2024 19:03
@philrenaud philrenaud changed the base branch from main to f-time-based-task-execution May 22, 2024 20:00
@philrenaud philrenaud requested review from schmichael and gulducat May 22, 2024 20:00
@philrenaud philrenaud removed the stage/needs-rebase This PR needs to be rebased on main before it can be backported to pick up new BPA workflows label May 22, 2024
@philrenaud philrenaud merged commit 256fd99 into f-time-based-task-execution May 22, 2024
14 checks passed
@philrenaud philrenaud deleted the f-ui/task-schedule-adherence branch May 22, 2024 20:14
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 7, 2025

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 120 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 7, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants