[batch/auth] Set accounts to "inactive" after extended inactivity

[grohli]

Change Description

Addressing compliance requirement wherein Hail accounts must be disabled/marked as inactive after a certain number of days of inactivity. This is accomplished as follows (pending PR revisions):

• A last_activated column has been added to the users table, used for storing a given user's last active timestamp;
• Anytime a user does anything requiring authorization, their last_activated timestamp is updated to the current date/time;
• An error is raised to the user if they attempt to do anything requiring authorization while their account has a status of 'inactive';
• A server event has been added that checks the users table once a day, and any 'active' users are marked as 'inactive' if their last_activated timestamp is more than 60 days old (configurable and will default to 60 unless specified otherwise); and
• Authorized developer functionality has been added to set a user's status to active if it's currently inactive while also updating the user's last_activated field to CURRENT_TIMESTAMP(3).

Security Assessment

• This change has a medium security impact

Impact Description

This change entails a change to the users table schema and additional authorization-related checks thereof, but none of this is exposed to users and all happens internally.

(Reviewers: please confirm the security impact before approving)

[patrick-schultz]

I don't have the batch context to review this thoroughly, but I do have some high level questions:

• What's the longest a user can use any part of the system without triggering a new authorization request? Is that on the order of a day?
• Do we have a process in mind for how to reactivate an inactive account? I'm sure we'll have occasional users who were working on something else for a few months, or were on leave, and want to resume using hail after being deactivated. I don't think the answer should be "a developer needs to manually modify the database". Maybe we should expose something in the developer web UI?
• Is modifying estimated-current.sql enough? My understanding is that that's more for documentation, and isn't used in production. I think we need to add a database migration to add the new column? (This is out of my depth!) I also remember past team members having a healthy fear of changes to the database, does anybody feel confident they know how this will work?

[cjllanwarne]

Responding to @patrick-schultz -

• What's the longest a user can use any part of the system without triggering a new authorization request? Is that on the order of a day?
  • Ignoring background tasks (like jobs running in VMs), any user activity or API call would re-trigger an authorization request
• Do we have a process in mind for how to reactivate an inactive account? I'm sure we'll have occasional users who were working on something else for a few months, or were on leave, and want to resume using hail after being deactivated. I don't think the answer should be "a developer needs to manually modify the database". Maybe we should expose something in the developer web UI?
  • I agree. This should probably be added to the users page for developer/admin users
• Is modifying estimated-current.sql enough? My understanding is that that's more for documentation, and isn't used in production. I think we need to add a database migration to add the new column? (This is out of my depth!) I also remember past team members having a healthy fear of changes to the database, does anybody feel confident they know how this will work?
  • I referenced this inline but no, it's not enough just to change estimated-current.sql