Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 9, 2024. It is now read-only.

Z-push fork #1

Closed
xbgmsharp opened this issue Mar 28, 2012 · 2 comments
Closed

Z-push fork #1

xbgmsharp opened this issue Mar 28, 2012 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@xbgmsharp
Copy link

Hello,

Sorry to create an issue on your project, but i could not send you an email via github.
I found your repository as z-push fork and many other.
However i have more or less done the same work adding other opensource groupware using carddav/caldav server
mine is https://github.com/xbgmsharp/sogosync

I think it is sad for all of us to work on the same idea but in our own.
I would like to know if you would be interest in working together to reduce repeat work and improve the use experience.
I don't from which project we start with but i really think we should concentrate our work.

So far the other project are (i am usre there is other)
https://github.com/xbgmsharp/sogosync
https://github.com/dekkers/s-push/
https://github.com/dpeddi/activesync
https://github.com/gza/oczpush
https://github.com/dupondje/PHP-Push

The main problem with PHP-Push is the code base made by https://www.forgetaboutit.net which is not using the same license.

What do you think?

Regards

@gza
Copy link
Owner

gza commented Mar 28, 2012

hi,

I agree with you, there are many forks of z-push.
But, oczpush is not really a simple fork.
I don't modify z-push codebase, the goal is to integrate it ( with conf UI, etc..) into owncloud as an app using native OC API.
In addition, I target z-push 2.0.

Our backends clearly speak the same language vcard and ical (I don't use DAV).
We could share some code ( like a ActiveSyncObject <-> vcard/ical conversion library ) and some ideas.
But communication protocol will be different (*DAV vs code api).

btw php-push is AGPL like original z-push.

Regards,

Guillaume ZITTA

@ghost ghost assigned gza Mar 28, 2012
@xbgmsharp
Copy link
Author

Hello,

Thanks for your reply.
I did not modify neither z-push.
Using z-push-2.x or z-push-1.5.x does not make to much difference as from a backend view as the method are the same.
So i believe we have different goal. My approach is more using pure standard so it work with any goupware and avoid what did zimbra or zafara as a specific backend.
We can definitely share code and ideas.

Regards,
Francois

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants