Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve the Kubernetes RBAC partial #38705

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ptgott
Copy link
Contributor

@ptgott ptgott commented Feb 27, 2024

Closes #18495

Edit the partial at docs/pages/includes/kubernetes-access/rbac.mdx so it does not require enabling access to an awkwardly named Kubernetes user based on the current context. Instead, have the user check whether they can already access Kubernetes users/groups, and if not, assign their Teleport user a role that can access a view-only group.

Copy link

The PR changelog entry failed validation: Changelog entry not found in the PR body. Please add a "no-changelog" label to the PR, or changelog lines starting with changelog: followed by the changelog entries for the PR.

Copy link

🤖 Vercel preview here: https://docs-cgvz5bn9w-goteleport.vercel.app/docs/ver/preview

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 1, 2024

The PR changelog entry failed validation: Changelog entry not found in the PR body. Please add a "no-changelog" label to the PR, or changelog lines starting with changelog: followed by the changelog entries for the PR.

@ptgott ptgott added the no-changelog Indicates that a PR does not require a changelog entry label Mar 1, 2024
@ptgott ptgott force-pushed the paul.gottschling/18495-kube branch from bd95175 to cb174d6 Compare March 5, 2024 15:25
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 5, 2024

🤖 Vercel preview here: https://docs-exb4yh354-goteleport.vercel.app/docs/ver/preview

@ptgott ptgott force-pushed the paul.gottschling/18495-kube branch from cb174d6 to ed7344b Compare March 6, 2024 19:35
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 6, 2024

🤖 Vercel preview here: https://docs-nokyt56hd-goteleport.vercel.app/docs/ver/preview

Closes #18495

Edit the partial at `docs/pages/includes/kubernetes-access/rbac.mdx` so
it does not require enabling access to an awkwardly named Kubernetes
user based on the current context. Instead, have the user check whether
they can already access Kubernetes users/groups, and if not, assign
their Teleport user a role that can access a view-only group.
@ptgott ptgott force-pushed the paul.gottschling/18495-kube branch from ed7344b to f288aa4 Compare March 14, 2024 15:41
Copy link

🤖 Vercel preview here: https://docs-fsef0wb0c-goteleport.vercel.app/docs/ver/preview

@ptgott ptgott requested a review from strideynet March 19, 2024 17:06
@ptgott ptgott added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 20, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit 793afd6 Mar 20, 2024
36 checks passed
@ptgott ptgott deleted the paul.gottschling/18495-kube branch March 20, 2024 21:34
@public-teleport-github-review-bot

@ptgott See the table below for backport results.

Branch Result
branch/v15 Create PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/branch/v15 documentation no-changelog Indicates that a PR does not require a changelog entry size/sm
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Clarify behaviour of kubernetes_users role field in docs
3 participants