Doc review #20
Merged
Doc review #20
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
‘user’ => ‘you’ Add more links to API documentation (including PyTorch) Tweak wording
thecharlieblake
force-pushed
the
doc-review
branch
from
df1ffd0 to
e4c9528
Compare
thecharlieblake
force-pushed
the
doc-review
branch
from
e4c9528 to
b7ca44f
Compare
thecharlieblake
approved these changes
May 31, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Suggested improvements to unit-scaling doc. Mainly just tweaks to wording and formatting.
Hav also added the utils module to the API section
Note: I have changed "the user" to "you" to be consistent with our general style. However, if you feel that is inconsistent with the expectations of a more academic audience, I am happy to leave it in the more "impersonal" mode