Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

r319: ruler: cap the number of remote eval retries #10388

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dimitarvdimitrov
Copy link
Contributor

#10375
(cherry picked from commit ffee57d)

* ruler: cap the number of remote eval retries

The retries happen more aggressively than actual evaluations. With the current setup an error spike results in 3x the query rate - initial query, and two retries fairly quickly 100ms & 200ms after that.

This PR changes that so that the whole process doesn't retry more than a fixed number of queries/sec. I chose 170 because at GL the average evals/sec is 340 per ruler. This would retry about half of the rules on average. _On average_ that should increase query load by 50%.

Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov <[email protected]>

* Add CHANGELOG.md entry

Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov <[email protected]>

* Fix a totally arbitrary stupid linter rule

Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov <[email protected]>

* Use a CB instead of a rate limtier

Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov <[email protected]>

* Revert "Use a CB instead of a rate limtier"

This reverts commit b07366f.

* Don't abort retries if we're over the rate limit

Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov <[email protected]>

* Cancel reservation when context expires

Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit ffee57d)
@dimitarvdimitrov dimitarvdimitrov requested review from a team and tacole02 as code owners January 9, 2025 14:25
@dimitarvdimitrov
Copy link
Contributor Author

we can probably skip this one

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant