Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: hint on line and timestamp functions in docs for line_format stage #12740

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 29, 2024

Conversation

sandeepsukhani
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:
Add a hint on how to access line and timestamp from the log line in the docs for line_format stage.

@sandeepsukhani sandeepsukhani requested a review from a team as a code owner April 23, 2024 07:17
@github-actions github-actions bot added the type/docs Issues related to technical documentation; the Docs Squad uses this label across many repositories label Apr 23, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@MichelHollands MichelHollands left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@JStickler JStickler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[Docs team] LGTM, I just updated the links to use full URLs.

@grafanabot
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR must be merged before a backport PR will be created.

@JStickler JStickler merged commit c3a3bc3 into main Apr 29, 2024
60 checks passed
@JStickler JStickler deleted the ref-line-timestamp-func-line-format branch April 29, 2024 18:57
grafanabot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2024
shantanualsi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport release-3.0.x size/XS type/docs Issues related to technical documentation; the Docs Squad uses this label across many repositories
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants