Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix handling of GET form submissions in submitForm() #448

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 11, 2018

Conversation

robingustafsson
Copy link
Member

@marklagendijk Here's a quick fix for handling GET form submissions, until we have #436.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #448 into master will increase coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 73.68%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #448      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   62.81%   62.89%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          90       90              
  Lines        6370     6376       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits         4001     4010       +9     
+ Misses       2146     2145       -1     
+ Partials      223      221       -2
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
js/modules/k6/http/response.go 65.25% <73.68%> (+4.53%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8397560...d7c32f1. Read the comment docs.

@marklagendijk
Copy link
Contributor

Nice! We need the logic and the test anyway. When #436 is done the implementation of this can just be a bit simplified.

@robingustafsson
Copy link
Member Author

Yup, true. I'll merge this now.

@robingustafsson robingustafsson merged commit 7438f38 into master Jan 11, 2018
@na-- na-- deleted the feature/fix-submit-form-get-qs branch March 12, 2018 20:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants