-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docker: Build multi platform images #3320
Conversation
Codecov ReportPatch coverage has no change and project coverage change:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3320 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 73.21% 73.20% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 258 258
Lines 19895 19895
==========================================
- Hits 14566 14564 -2
- Misses 4404 4406 +2
Partials 925 925
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@mstoykov @olegbespalov Just for sharing other plans. I would like to apply in a dedicated PR after this how we are doing the push. We now are processing sequentially by registry. I would prefer if we do it instead by kind of build. I take the assumption that the risk of failure is higher between the different versions than the same build pushed across different registries. Essentially, I'm suggesting doing the equivalent solution: https://docs.docker.com/build/ci/github-actions/push-multi-registries/ WDYT? |
89cb8de
to
dde958d
Compare
dde958d
to
a6219a0
Compare
What?
Support docker builds for arm64
Why?
Users are requesting it more and more times
Related PR(s)/Issue(s)
Closes #3301