Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(rules): upstream recording rule switched to sum_irate #379

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 25, 2021
Merged

fix(rules): upstream recording rule switched to sum_irate #379

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
97cf90e
fix(rules): upstream recording rule switched to sum_irate
Duologic Aug 25, 2021
79c5f75
add changelog
Duologic Aug 25, 2021
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion cortex-mixin/recording_rules.libsonnet
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ local utils = import 'mixin-utils/utils.libsonnet';
sum by (cluster, namespace, deployment) (
label_replace(
label_replace(
node_namespace_pod_container:container_cpu_usage_seconds_total:sum_rate,
node_namespace_pod_container:container_cpu_usage_seconds_total:sum_irate,
Copy link
Member Author

@Duologic Duologic Aug 25, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure if we should reflect that in the name of this recording rule too (line 211).

"deployment", "$1", "pod", "(.*)-(?:([0-9]+)|([a-z0-9]+)-([a-z0-9]+))"
),
# The question mark in "(.*?)" is used to make it non-greedy, otherwise it
Expand Down