Making Blob.storage_class settable. #3328
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
googlebot
added
the
cla: yes
theacodes
approved these changes
Apr 27, 2017
richkadel
pushed a commit
to richkadel/google-cloud-python
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2017
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In some sense, this setter should be disabled for objects / blobs that already exist, but there is no way to tell without calling
exists()and we SHOULD NOT require a round trip just to use a@propertysetter.Instead, we rely on the backend (and the documentation) to inform users when it is OK to use the setter.