-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pub/Sub Releases Page for Google Cloud Client Library for Python Needs An Update #5894
Comments
The |
@theacodes I tried to poke into this, but couldn't figure out how the contents of the $ git checkout gh-pages
Branch gh-pages set up to track remote branch gh-pages from upstream.
Switched to a new branch 'gh-pages'
$ cd stable
$ git log .
commit ec7539ebf717f06f65860b7652031f5a91469741
Author: Christopher Wilcox <[email protected]>
Date: Mon Apr 23 16:49:18 2018 -0700
Redirect all pages of GitHub.io site to RTD (#5225)
* generate redirect md for each file in github pages
add config file that makes redirects work using jekyll plugin
* delete versions not on RTD
* mirror latest to stable
commit db32b916b3e36242dd1561a81131391dadf65ccd
Author: Danny Hermes <[email protected]>
Date: Wed Dec 20 09:59:08 2017 -0800
Removing `stable/` docs from `gh-pages`. (#4637)
Done via:
$ git rm -fr stable/
Fixes #4611.
So, it looks like @crwilcox repopulated the |
Sounds reasonable to me? |
* Replace links to '/stable/' with '/latest/'. * DRY out duplicated 'README.rst' vs. 'docs/index.rst'. * Include websecurityscanner in docs. Toward #5894.
@theacodes Should the version trees for |
If the docs are broken, we should drop them.
…On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 1:06 PM Tres Seaver ***@***.***> wrote:
@theacodes <https://github.com/theacodes> Should the version trees for
gcloud stay under gh-pages, e,g the 0.10.0 version
<https://google-cloud-python.readthedocs.io/en/0.10.0/>. OTOH, all the
_modules bits under gh-pages:0.10.0 are broken.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5894 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAPUczWj6TtUwi7hGEdJkHE8hLN7hyUBks5uZsZdgaJpZM4Wdgkr>
.
|
I don't even know what the |
hrm that's probably not very important then.
…On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 1:16 PM Tres Seaver ***@***.***> wrote:
I don't even know what the _modules bits are for. (/me looks). Hmm, seems
to be pages generated for source code.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5894 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAPUc5Ybzv1Kq17bBEHIacs8FvqCpLj5ks5uZsi2gaJpZM4Wdgkr>
.
|
So, on the
In addition, should we tweak the RTD config to drop the version-specific and stable builds? BTW, if you'd like to add me as a maintainer / owner there, I can poke at it. |
readthedocs is basically dead for us.
…On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 10:42 AM Tres Seaver ***@***.***> wrote:
So, on the gh-pages branch, should I:
- git rm -r stable/ 0.*/
- Or just leave them as they are.
In addition, should we tweak the RTD config to drop the version-specific
and stable builds? BTW, if you'd like to add me as a maintainer / owner
there, I can poke at it.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5894 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAPUc_KPl7CwTGs54t3GcEpehfl0THtZks5uZ_X_gaJpZM4Wdgkr>
.
|
But would it be, post repo-split? I have a suspicion, for instance, that the ginormous |
Maybe, but it's also possible we might switch hosting altogether.
…On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 11:45 AM Tres Seaver ***@***.***> wrote:
But would it be, post repo-split? I have a suspicion, for instance, that
the ginormous docs/bigquery/generated bit (from autosummary) may be
killing the RTD build.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5894 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAPUc6WSyuiIO4mBLMYNni5NeRwl3yuHks5uaASqgaJpZM4Wdgkr>
.
|
Hmm, too bad we don't know somebody who has a free-to-us place to put static HTML for documentation websites. :) |
Haha.
…On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 12:09 PM Tres Seaver ***@***.***> wrote:
Maybe, but it's also possible we might switch hosting altogether.
Hmm, too bad we don't know somebody who has a free-to-us place to put
static HTML for documentation websites. :)
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5894 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAPUc3XLokn9s_bPCLiXKe7I1e5IXploks5uaApVgaJpZM4Wdgkr>
.
|
So, should I just remove the stale pages from the $ git fetch --all
$ git checkout gh-pages
$ git merge upstream/gh-pages
$ git rm -r 0.8.0/
$ git rm -r 0.9.0/
$ git rm -r 0.10.0/
$ git rm -r 0.10.1/
$ git rm -r stable/
$ git commit -m "Take out trash."
$ git push upstream gh-pages |
Sure, but can we make a 404 page that does a JS redirect if some lost soul
finds themselves there?
…On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:45 AM Tres Seaver ***@***.***> wrote:
So, should I just remove the stale pages from the gh-pages branch? E.g.:
$ git fetch --all
$ git checkout gh-pages
$ git merge upstream/gh-pages
$ git rm -r 0.8.0/
$ git rm -r 0.9.0/
$ git rm -r 0.10.0/
$ git rm -r 0.10.1/
$ git rm -r stable/
$ git commit -m "Take out trash."
$ git push upstream gh-pages
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5894 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAPUcx0H66kEvzc9p-60b0Ybti3xsfGBks5uaqfZgaJpZM4Wdgkr>
.
|
Add a 404 page to help direct folks to 'latest'. Closes #5894
* Replace links to '/stable/' with '/latest/'. * DRY out duplicated 'README.rst' vs. 'docs/index.rst'. * Include websecurityscanner in docs. Toward #5894.
* Replace links to '/stable/' with '/latest/'. * DRY out duplicated 'README.rst' vs. 'docs/index.rst'. * Include websecurityscanner in docs. Toward #5894.
* Replace links to '/stable/' with '/latest/'. * DRY out duplicated 'README.rst' vs. 'docs/index.rst'. * Include websecurityscanner in docs. Toward #5894.
* Replace links to '/stable/' with '/latest/'. * DRY out duplicated 'README.rst' vs. 'docs/index.rst'. * Include websecurityscanner in docs. Toward #5894.
* Replace links to '/stable/' with '/latest/'. * DRY out duplicated 'README.rst' vs. 'docs/index.rst'. * Include websecurityscanner in docs. Toward #5894.
* Replace links to '/stable/' with '/latest/'. * DRY out duplicated 'README.rst' vs. 'docs/index.rst'. * Include websecurityscanner in docs. Toward #5894.
* Replace links to '/stable/' with '/latest/'. * DRY out duplicated 'README.rst' vs. 'docs/index.rst'. * Include websecurityscanner in docs. Toward #5894.
* Replace links to '/stable/' with '/latest/'. * DRY out duplicated 'README.rst' vs. 'docs/index.rst'. * Include websecurityscanner in docs. Toward #5894.
* Replace links to '/stable/' with '/latest/'. * DRY out duplicated 'README.rst' vs. 'docs/index.rst'. * Include websecurityscanner in docs. Toward #5894.
* Replace links to '/stable/' with '/latest/'. * DRY out duplicated 'README.rst' vs. 'docs/index.rst'. * Include websecurityscanner in docs. Toward #5894.
* Replace links to '/stable/' with '/latest/'. * DRY out duplicated 'README.rst' vs. 'docs/index.rst'. * Include websecurityscanner in docs. Toward #5894.
* Replace links to '/stable/' with '/latest/'. * DRY out duplicated 'README.rst' vs. 'docs/index.rst'. * Include websecurityscanner in docs. Toward #5894.
* Replace links to '/stable/' with '/latest/'. * DRY out duplicated 'README.rst' vs. 'docs/index.rst'. * Include websecurityscanner in docs. Toward #5894.
The latest release for Pub/Sub is 0.37.2. But the releases page is somewhat behind at 0.30.0.
Could we update this page? https://google-cloud-python.readthedocs.io/en/stable/pubsub/releases.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: