Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

check if network key exists #22

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2020
Merged

check if network key exists #22

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2020

Conversation

okwme
Copy link
Contributor

@okwme okwme commented Oct 15, 2019

ran into this problem while using buidler to compile contracts. They don't include network in the artifact by default so this line throws. I've opened an issue on their repo to follow truffle's artifacts format by including the network key. Couldn't hurt to check for the key here anyway...

NomicFoundation/hardhat#386

ran into this problem while using buidler to compile contracts. They don't include network in the artifact by default so this line throws. I've opened an issue on their repo to follow truffle's artifacts format by including the network key. Couldn't hurt to check for the key here anyway...
@bh2smith
Copy link
Contributor

bh2smith commented Dec 1, 2020

Thanks @okwme, I'd be OK to include this if you could provide a description of how to reproduce the issue!

@okwme
Copy link
Contributor Author

okwme commented Dec 2, 2020

this is code i haven't touched for over a year so not able to provide a description of how to reproduce the issue.
looking at it with fresh eyes seems like it should be an uncontroversial addition but feel free to determine that on your own.

@bh2smith
Copy link
Contributor

bh2smith commented Dec 3, 2020

Cool beans. Consider is merged!

@bh2smith bh2smith merged commit 2384691 into gnosis:master Dec 3, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants