Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enhance Value#of Method for Improved Item Data Retrieval (Components compatibility) #1996
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Enhance Value#of Method for Improved Item Data Retrieval (Components compatibility) #1996
Changes from 2 commits
202f4ab
ebd2d56
900b911
2c91420
0d7840e
13ee2e4
d1051df
55c63e5
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if you pack all of those k-v pairs to a NBT tag again, why you left the switch there?
you can let Number&Boolean use the default case too.
and you no longer need to use a NBTSerializableValue to warp the
res
tag.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've changed that to your implementation, removing the part that took the item from the main hand in case of no values passed to the function. I also removed unedited files. It should be fine now, I guess
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
then you please edit your Overview, Reason and Request for Review......