CSUB-1131: Provision self-hosted runner(s) with more labels #351
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
atodorov
force-pushed
the
testing/CSUB-1131-provision-self-hosted-runners-with-more-labels
branch
2 times, most recently
from
dbda6e3 to
8ea4486
Compare
|
For full LLVM coverage report click here! |
these will look something like this when all values are specified: - workflow-8939801487 - proxy-yes - secret-not-a-proxy - type-NonTransfer and can later be used for integration-test-cli matrix jobs which will match against them
atodorov
force-pushed
the
testing/CSUB-1131-provision-self-hosted-runners-with-more-labels
branch
from
8ea4486 to
10de5c3
Compare
atodorov
deleted the
testing/CSUB-1131-provision-self-hosted-runners-with-more-labels
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of proposed changes
Only last few commits are relevant. Checking to see whether specifying non-existent labels will break workflows which don't use them.