Review full_width with custom input sizes uses #18963
Merged
+101
−206
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
cedric-anne
requested review from
orthagh,
cedric-anne and
AdrienClairembault
orthagh
approved these changes
Feb 11, 2025
AdrienClairembault
approved these changes
Feb 11, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist before requesting a review
Description
The alignment of fields when using
full_widthwas recently fixed but there were several cases where the sizes of labels and inputs was statically set to try fixing the alignment in individual use cases. These cases are no longer needed and in some cases were not producing the expected results.