Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump html pipeline to 2.0 #1

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 14, 2016
Merged

Bump html pipeline to 2.0 #1

merged 5 commits into from
Jan 14, 2016

Conversation

benbalter
Copy link
Collaborator

In addition to gjtorikian/jekyll-html-pipeline#7, this makes link-rewrite-filter compatible with the Jekyll 3 Gems, which depend on HTML Pipeline ~> 2.0,

@parkr
Copy link
Collaborator

parkr commented Jan 14, 2016

:shipit:

@@ -18,9 +15,10 @@ Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
spec.executables = spec.files.grep(%r{^exe/}) { |f| File.basename(f) }
spec.require_paths = ["lib"]

spec.add_dependency 'html-pipeline', "~> 1.0"
spec.add_dependency 'html-pipeline', "~> 2.0"
spec.add_dependency 'github-markdown', "~> 0.6"
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is Markdown needed?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe because class LinkRewriterFilter < HTML::Pipeline::MarkdownFilter. Without the dependencies:

➜  link-rewriter-filter git:(html-pipeline-2) ✗ script/cibuild
Missing dependency 'github-markdown' for MarkdownFilter. See README.md for details.

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ack, you're right.

gjtorikian added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2016
@gjtorikian gjtorikian merged commit 43a1d6a into gjtorikian:master Jan 14, 2016
@benbalter benbalter deleted the html-pipeline-2 branch January 14, 2016 19:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants