Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update testing docs: Order Factory meta data and request methods #2388

Merged

Conversation

mralaminahamed
Copy link
Member

@mralaminahamed mralaminahamed commented Oct 3, 2024

All Submissions:

  • My code follow the WordPress' coding standards
  • My code satisfies feature requirements
  • My code is tested
  • My code passes the PHPCS tests
  • My code has proper inline documentation
  • I've included developer documentation
  • I've added proper labels to this pull request

Changes proposed in this Pull Request:

This PR updates the testing documentation for Dokan. Specifically, it:

  1. Adds information about adding meta data to orders using the Order Factory
  2. Includes documentation for PUT and DELETE request methods in API testing

These changes provide more comprehensive guidance for developers writing tests for Dokan, improving test coverage and consistency.

Related Pull Request(s)

  • N/A

Closes

  • N/A

How to test the changes in this Pull Request:

  1. Review the updated documentation in the get-started.md file
  2. Verify that the new information about Order Factory meta data is clear and accurate
  3. Check that the documentation for PUT and DELETE request methods is comprehensive and easy to understand

Changelog entry

Update testing documentation for Order Factory and API request methods

Updated the testing documentation to include information on adding meta data to orders using the Order Factory and documentation for PUT and DELETE request methods in API testing. This improves the guidance for developers writing tests for Dokan.

Before Changes

The documentation lacked information on adding meta data to orders and didn't cover PUT and DELETE request methods for API testing.

After Changes

The documentation now includes detailed information on how to add meta data to orders using the Order Factory and provides guidance on using PUT and DELETE request methods in API tests.

Feature Video (optional)

N/A

PR Self Review Checklist:

  • Code is following code style guidelines
  • Good naming: clear and descriptive
  • KISS: Keep it simple, Sweetie (not stupid!)
  • DRY: Don't Repeat Yourself
  • Code is readable
  • No performance issues
  • No complicated constructions that need refactoring or comments
  • No grammar errors

FOR PR REVIEWER ONLY:

  • Correct — Does the change do what it's supposed to?
  • Secure — Would a nefarious party find some way to exploit this change?
  • Readable — Will your future self be able to understand this change months down the road?
  • Elegant — Does the change fit aesthetically within the overall style and architecture?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Enhanced clarity and functionality of factory methods in unit testing documentation.
    • Expanded Order Factory section with detailed examples and a new subsection for adding metadata.
    • Updated get-started.md with new tests for PUT and DELETE requests, improved structure, and clarified recommendations for writing effective test cases.

@mralaminahamed mralaminahamed added Needs: Dev Review It requires a developer review and approval Need Dev Review Only labels Oct 3, 2024
@mralaminahamed mralaminahamed self-assigned this Oct 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes significant updates to two documentation files: docs/tdd/factories.md and docs/tdd/get-started.md. The factories.md document has been enhanced with detailed examples for the Order Factory, specifically introducing a meta_data parameter for order creation. The get-started.md file has been expanded to include new tests for PUT and DELETE requests, along with improved structural organization and clarity in recommendations for writing tests.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/tdd/factories.md Expanded Order Factory section with examples for creating orders with meta_data. Updated code snippets and improved readability.
docs/tdd/get-started.md Added tests for PUT and DELETE requests, refined document structure, clarified recommendations, and provided more examples for grouping test cases.

Possibly related PRs

  • Test: metdata support for order factory #2347: This PR enhances the OrderFactory class by adding support for metadata in the order creation process, which directly relates to the main PR's changes in the Order Factory section of the documentation regarding the new meta_data parameter.
  • fix: duplicate test methods in DokanTestCase.php #2382: This PR removes the delete_request and put_request methods from the DokanTestCase class, which are relevant to the testing framework that may interact with the order creation process discussed in the main PR.
  • Add product form tests #2383: This PR introduces tests for the product form functionality, which may include aspects related to order creation and metadata handling, aligning with the enhancements made in the main PR.
  • Add: add product form tests (gallery, description) #2385: This PR adds tests specifically for product form functionalities, including gallery and description management, which could be relevant to the overall testing framework that the main PR aims to improve through its documentation updates.

Suggested labels

QA approved, Test Automation, Upcoming Release

Suggested reviewers

  • mrabbani
  • shohag121

🐰 In the land of tests and code so bright,
New features bloom, a wonderful sight!
With metadata added, orders take flight,
Clarity reigns, and everything's right!
So hop along, let’s code with delight! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
docs/tdd/factories.md (3)

163-173: Great addition of meta_data example!

The inclusion of the meta_data array in the order creation example is a valuable addition. It clearly demonstrates how to add both unique and non-unique meta data to an order.

Consider adding a brief comment above the meta_data array to explain its purpose, e.g.:

// Add custom meta data to the order
'meta_data' => [
    // ... (rest of the code remains the same)
],

This would further enhance the readability and educational value of the example.


208-233: Excellent new section on adding meta data!

The new "Adding Meta Data to Orders" section is a valuable addition to the documentation. It provides clear explanations and a consistent example of how to add meta data to orders.

To make the section even more comprehensive, consider adding a brief note about how to retrieve or use the meta data after it's been added to an order. For example:

To retrieve the meta data later, you can use the `get_meta()` method on the order object:

```php
$order = wc_get_order($order_id);
$custom_value = $order->get_meta('_custom_meta_key');
This addition would provide a complete picture of working with order meta data in tests.

---

`242-242`: **Improved clarity in the final paragraph**

The modification to this sentence enhances its readability and clarity.



There's a small typo in the sentence. Consider changing:
```diff
- Our application test code will be consistent because well will be to change wrapper method to make compatible with WC changes.
+ Our application test code will be consistent because we will be able to change wrapper methods to make them compatible with WC changes.

This correction will further improve the clarity of the explanation.

docs/tdd/get-started.md (1)

314-314: Great addition of test grouping information!

The new content on grouping test cases is very informative and aligns well with best practices for organizing tests. It provides clear instructions on how to use the @group annotation and run grouped tests.

However, there's a minor formatting issue:

Please remove the extra empty line (line 314) at the end of the code block to maintain consistent formatting throughout the document.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9a21a84 and 2c09b2c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/tdd/factories.md (3 hunks)
  • docs/tdd/get-started.md (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
docs/tdd/factories.md (2)

Line range hint 1-242: Excellent documentation structure and content

The overall structure and content of the file are well-maintained and enhanced with the new additions. The documentation provides a comprehensive guide for using Dokan Factories in unit testing, with a good balance of explanations and code examples.

The new sections on meta data are well-integrated and add valuable information for developers working with orders in their tests. The file continues to serve as an excellent resource for the Dokan project.


Line range hint 1-242: Changes align well with PR objectives

The updates to this file directly address the PR objective of enhancing the testing documentation for Order Factory meta data. The new sections and examples provide clear and comprehensive guidance on how to add meta data to orders in tests.

These changes will significantly improve the developer experience when writing tests involving orders with meta data in the Dokan framework.

docs/tdd/get-started.md (2)

132-141: Excellent addition of PUT and DELETE request examples!

The new code for PUT and DELETE requests aligns perfectly with the PR objectives. It provides clear examples of how to make these requests and access the response data, maintaining consistency with the existing GET and POST examples. This addition significantly enhances the documentation's completeness.


Line range hint 1-314: Excellent enhancements to the testing documentation!

The changes made to this file significantly improve the comprehensiveness and clarity of the testing documentation for the Dokan project. The additions align perfectly with the PR objectives:

  1. The new examples for PUT and DELETE requests in the API Test section address the previously missing information.
  2. The expanded content on grouping test cases provides valuable guidance for organizing tests effectively.
  3. The overall structure and formatting improvements enhance the document's readability.

These updates will greatly benefit developers working on the Dokan project by providing clearer and more comprehensive guidance for writing and organizing tests.

@Aunshon Aunshon merged commit b4f7379 into getdokan:develop Oct 16, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants