Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: add index to cost type model #574

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 13, 2024
Merged

fix: add index to cost type model #574

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 13, 2024

Conversation

Hrishabh17
Copy link
Contributor

@Hrishabh17 Hrishabh17 commented Nov 12, 2024

Description

Added index on project_id, task_id, task_name in cost type model

Clickup

http://app.clickup.com/

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new database indexes for the CostType model to enhance query performance for project_id, task_id, and task_name.
  • Bug Fixes

    • No bug fixes were included in this release.
  • Documentation

    • Updated documentation to reflect the new indexing features in the CostType model.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 12, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces new database indexes for the costtype model in the sage_intacct application. Specifically, three indexes are added for the fields project_id, task_id, and task_name to enhance query performance. The migration file establishes dependencies to ensure correct application order, while the model file reflects these index additions in the Meta class of the CostType model.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/sage_intacct/migrations/0030_auto_20241112_0425.py Added three new indexes for the costtype model: project_id, task_id, and task_name.
apps/sage_intacct/models.py Updated CostType model to include new indexes for project_id, task_id, and task_name.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix: send unique task name in payload #562: The changes in this PR involve the task_name variable, which is also indexed in the main PR, indicating a potential relationship in how task_name is managed across the application.

Suggested labels

size/XS

Suggested reviewers

  • ashwin1111

Poem

🐇 In the garden where data grows,
New indexes sprout, as everyone knows.
For project_id, task_id, and more,
Queries will dance, performance to soar!
With each little hop, our models align,
In the world of code, everything's fine! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/S Small PR label Nov 12, 2024
Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
282 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 40.667s ⏱️

Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
282 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 41.578s ⏱️

@Hrishabh17 Hrishabh17 merged commit 22fddd6 into master Nov 13, 2024
3 checks passed
Hrishabh17 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size/S Small PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants