feat: Add GitHub PR Checks Workflow #545
Conversation
abhishek1234321
temporarily deployed
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Inactive
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@shubham-fyle has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 29 minutes and 33 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThis update introduces new checks for pull requests within the GitHub Actions framework. It establishes two primary requirements: PR titles must begin with specific prefixes, and descriptions must include a link to ClickUp. These changes aim to standardize the format of contributions and ensure relevant task references are provided, enhancing the overall clarity and organization of pull requests. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/pr_checks_config.yaml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
.github/workflows/pr_checks_config.yaml (2)
2-5: LGTM! Title check configuration is well-defined.The regex pattern correctly enforces the required prefixes for PR titles, and the message provides clear guidance to contributors.
7-10: LGTM! Description check configuration is well-defined.The regex pattern effectively ensures that a ClickUp link is included in the PR description, and the message provides clear instructions.
abhishek1234321
temporarily deployed
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Inactive
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/pr_checks_config.yaml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/pr_checks_config.yaml
|
will wait for clickup removal - removing request for now |
shubham-fyle
temporarily deployed
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Inactive
|
shubham-fyle
temporarily deployed
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Inactive
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/pr-checks-config.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/pr-checks.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
.github/pr-checks-config.yml (1)
3-5: LGTM!The
prefix_checkconfiguration is well-defined and enforces a consistent format for PR titles. The regex pattern correctly matches the required prefixes in a case-insensitive manner, and the message clearly communicates the expected format if the title does not match..github/workflows/pr-checks.yml (3)
2-6: LGTM!The workflow name "Strong PR Checks" accurately reflects the purpose of introducing automated checks for pull requests. Triggering the workflow on pull request events (opened, synchronized, and edited) ensures that the checks are run at the appropriate times during the pull request lifecycle.
8-10: Workflow permissions look good.The workflow grants the necessary permissions:
- Write permission for pull-requests allows the workflow to add comments or labels to the pull request.
- Read permission for contents enables the workflow to access the repository files, which is required for running the checks.
12-20: The job configuration looks good.
- Running the job on the latest version of Ubuntu ensures a stable and up-to-date environment.
- Using the
fylein/fyle-pr-action@v1action allows for the execution of strong checks on the pull request.- Providing the GitHub token from the repository's secrets ensures secure access to the necessary API endpoints.
- Specifying the configuration file (
.github/pr-checks-config.yml) allows for customization of the checks based on the project's requirements.Please ensure that the specified configuration file (
.github/pr-checks-config.yml) exists in the repository. You can use the following script to verify its existence:Verification successful
Configuration file verified and job setup confirmed
The verification process has confirmed that the configuration file
.github/pr-checks-config.ymlexists in the repository. This validates that the job configuration in the PR-checks workflow is correctly referencing an existing file, ensuring that the strong checks can be executed as intended.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the configuration file. # Test: Check if the configuration file exists. Expect: File found. if [ -f ".github/pr-checks-config.yml" ]; then echo "Configuration file found: .github/pr-checks-config.yml" else echo "Configuration file not found: .github/pr-checks-config.yml" exit 1 fiLength of output: 160
.github/pr-checks-config.yml
Outdated
| - name: 'clickup_check' | ||
| regex: '(?i)app.clickup.com' | ||
| message_if_not_matching: 'PR description must contain a link to a ClickUp (case-insensitive)' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider the impact of mandating ClickUp links in PR descriptions.
The clickup_check configuration enforces the inclusion of a ClickUp link in PR descriptions, which aims to ensure that relevant task references are provided. However, as raised by a user in the comments, this requirement may create friction for contributors who do not use or have access to ClickUp.
While providing task references is valuable for context and traceability, mandating the use of a specific tool may limit flexibility and potentially discourage contributions. Consider the following alternatives:
- Allow for more generic task reference formats, such as "Resolves: TASK-123" or "Related to: ISSUE-456", without specifying the tool.
- Provide clear guidelines for task referencing in the PR template or contributing guidelines, but make it optional rather than a strict requirement.
- Encourage the use of ClickUp or other task management tools through documentation and onboarding materials, but avoid enforcing it through automated checks.
By adopting a more inclusive approach, you can still promote the inclusion of relevant task references while accommodating a wider range of contributors and their preferred workflows.
shubham-fyle
temporarily deployed
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Inactive
|
https://app.clickup.com/
Summary by CodeRabbit