Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Audit and revise get-started/overview #171

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 5, 2022
Merged

Conversation

rjan90
Copy link
Collaborator

@rjan90 rjan90 commented Apr 27, 2022

Audit and revise the get-started/overview page.

We should have the Setup-section in place before merging this.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 27, 2022

Deploy Preview for lotus-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit c55c62f
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/lotus-docs/deploys/6273dee59d676e00086df5cc
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-171--lotus-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

rjan90 added 3 commits May 5, 2022 09:22
Audit and revise the `get-started/overview` page.
Some spelling fixes
Adding key concepts to the overview-page
@rjan90 rjan90 force-pushed the fix/audit-get-started-overview branch from 6fe9f51 to 7f175bf Compare May 5, 2022 13:25
Add full path
@rjan90 rjan90 marked this pull request as ready for review May 5, 2022 14:01
Copy link
Collaborator

@TippyFlitsUK TippyFlitsUK left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good!!

@rjan90 rjan90 requested a review from johnnymatthews May 5, 2022 14:28
@rjan90 rjan90 merged commit 48dc6f7 into main May 5, 2022
@rjan90 rjan90 deleted the fix/audit-get-started-overview branch May 5, 2022 15:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants