Error: invalid address (arg="address", value=undefined, version=4.0.22)

[ochikov]

Hello,
when trying to deploy a contract in locally run ganache network, I am getting the following error:

{ Error: invalid address (arg="address", value=undefined, version=4.0.22)
    at Object.throwError (/Users/ognyanchikov/Etherlime/etherlime/node_modules/ethers/errors.js:76:17)
    at Object.getAddress [as from] (/Users/ognyanchikov/Etherlime/etherlime/node_modules/ethers/utils/address.js:75:16)
    at check (/Users/ognyanchikov/Etherlime/etherlime/node_modules/ethers/providers/base-provider.js:41:36)
    at checkTransactionReceipt (/Users/ognyanchikov/Etherlime/etherlime/node_modules/ethers/providers/base-provider.js:301:18)
    at /Users/ognyanchikov/Etherlime/etherlime/node_modules/ethers/providers/base-provider.js:927:39
    at <anonymous>
    at process._tickDomainCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:228:7)
  reason: 'invalid address',
  code: 'INVALID_ARGUMENT',
  arg: 'address',
  value: undefined,
  checkKey: 'from',
  checkValue: undefined } 

I tried with version 4.0.21 and this error is not present.
Thank you.

[ricmoo]

this may be related to the change I made yesterday which expects a from in transaction receipts. It looks like Ganache may not properly add it, so I’ll make it an optional property today.

[ricmoo]

This was caused by the fix to #398.

I've died it locally and will publish once the regression tests have passed.

We are working on a new suite of tests which will test providers against Ganache, parity, Geth, et al, so in the future these little incompatibilities between clients will be caught.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

[ricmoo]

This should be fixed in 4.0.23; can you try it out and let me know if you still have any problems?

Thanks! :)

[ochikov]

Yes, it is fixed in version 4.0.23. We can close the issue. Thank you.

[ricmoo]

Awesome!

Thanks! :)