Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Readd multiselect changes #887

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2025
Merged

Readd multiselect changes #887

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2025

Conversation

EdwardBrunton
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code.
  • I have linked my DevOps task using the AB# tag.
  • My code is easy to read, and comments are added where needed.
  • My code is covered by tests.

@EdwardBrunton EdwardBrunton requested a review from kslazykv January 8, 2025 13:38
@github-actions github-actions bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file missing test There doesnt seem to be a test associated with this preservation Changes to preservation module labels Jan 8, 2025
@EdwardBrunton EdwardBrunton merged commit 30505e7 into master Jan 8, 2025
4 checks passed
@EdwardBrunton EdwardBrunton deleted the feat/readd-multiselect branch January 8, 2025 13:53
Copy link
Contributor

@kslazykv kslazykv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, I don't see any errors.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file missing test There doesnt seem to be a test associated with this preservation Changes to preservation module
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants