Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
config: shadow-based upgrading/downgrading for versioned messages. #9502
config: shadow-based upgrading/downgrading for versioned messages. #9502
Changes from 1 commit
d64ef44
e7e5b46
78b4182
926245f
3b05b15
5cf8693
7766d7b
4270fbb
3f55e8a
253157a
bef539a
cef6b04
0c56fc0
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Q: When we do this pattern is there any concern around non-deterministic ordering of the conversion? Might this get confusing when using dump tools or anything else which depends on the output? Should we be using the deterministic serialization options? Also maybe move this pattern to a utility function where we do it so we can better explain what we are doing?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since both descriptors are fully known, as are any extensions/options that should be material to representation or other debug use, and we're remaining at the abstraction level of messages, I think it's safe to do this. But, I would be keen to hear what @lizan has to say on this. I'll factor it out to a separate utility meanwhile.