-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
xds: Add self config source type. #8201
Merged
mattklein123
merged 1 commit into
envoyproxy:master
from
markdroth:xds_config_source_self
Sep 20, 2019
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ LDS | |
LEV | ||
LHS | ||
LF | ||
LRS | ||
MB | ||
MD | ||
MGET | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we need to have some more discussion on this approach. Specifically, if the idea is really to make things like LRS sticky, it's arguably not the most practical approach, since it provides little guarantee. After speaking to Vishal about this, I think a better approach might be credential indirection, so let's discuss this next week.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What kind of guarantee are you concerned about not having here?
I think that even if we decide on a different approach for LRS, this would still be useful for cases where a management server is not using ADS but wants to redirect clients to itself when linking from LDS to RDS or from CDS to EDS. But I don't have a concrete use-case that needs that right now, so that is a bit speculative.
In any case, I'm happy to discuss this further when you get back.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's just discuss in the meeting we already have scheduled for next week? While I don't have any inherent objection to the feature I am a bit concerned about implementation complexity.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, let's talk about this when we meet next week. I had originally scheduled the meeting about the LRS-in-CDS issue, but we now have enough open discussions that I figure we can just use that meeting to talk about all of them (or at least as many as we can fit into the available time).