Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VNX: support to specify SP in SMP creation #336

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 28, 2020
Merged

Conversation

yong-huang
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 23, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #336 (a6575cd) into master (1c4e44b) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #336      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.77%   91.76%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         100      100              
  Lines       13998    14000       +2     
  Branches     1697     1698       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits        12846    12847       +1     
  Misses        741      741              
- Partials      411      412       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
storops/vnx/block_cli.py 96.17% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
storops/vnx/resource/lun.py 86.61% <100.00%> (ø)
storops/vnx/heart_beat.py 93.98% <0.00%> (-0.47%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1c4e44b...a6575cd. Read the comment docs.

@yong-huang yong-huang merged commit e729361 into master Dec 28, 2020
@yong-huang yong-huang deleted the vnx-smp-specify-sp branch December 28, 2020 02:43
yong-huang added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2021
- 5bac468 Support for Unity quota management (#344)
- 7254045 Unity: support of HTTP header Application-Type (#341)
- e729361 VNX: support to specify SP in SMP creation (#336)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant