feat: Add features to the Solana Agent Kit #2458
Conversation
…za into 1619--add-solana-agent-kit
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces comprehensive enhancements to the Solana plugin ecosystem, expanding its capabilities with new actions for token management, swapping, lending, staking, and transfer operations. A significant architectural change involves replacing direct Changes
Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (14)
packages/plugin-solana-agentkit/src/actions/stake.ts (2)
29-30: Ensurecontent.amountis defined before type checking.Add a check to ensure
content.amountis notundefinedbefore verifying its type.Apply this diff to improve the type check:
function isStakeContent( runtime: IAgentRuntime, content: any ): content is StakeContent { elizaLogger.log("Content for stake", content); return ( - typeof content.amount === "number" + content.amount !== undefined && typeof content.amount === "number" ); }
38-39: Use a numeric value foramountin the example response.The
amountshould be a number, not a string, to match the expected type inStakeContent.Apply this diff to correct the example:
{ - "amount": "100", + "amount": 100 }packages/plugin-solana-agentkit/src/actions/lend.ts (2)
29-30: Ensurecontent.amountis defined before type checking.Add a check to ensure
content.amountis notundefinedbefore verifying its type.Apply this diff to improve the type check:
function isLendAssetContent( runtime: IAgentRuntime, content: any ): content is LendAssetContent { elizaLogger.log("Content for lend", content); return ( - typeof content.amount === "number" + content.amount !== undefined && typeof content.amount === "number" ); }
38-39: Use a numeric value foramountin the example response.The
amountshould be a number, not a string, to match the expected type inLendAssetContent.Apply this diff to correct the example:
{ - "amount": "100", + "amount": 100 }packages/plugin-solana-agentkit/src/actions/getTokenInfo.ts (2)
28-28: Correct the log message inisGetTokenInfoContentThe log message incorrectly refers to "Content for transfer" instead of "Content for getTokenInfo".
- elizaLogger.log("Content for transfer", content); + elizaLogger.log("Content for getTokenInfo", content);
105-105: UseelizaLoggerfor consistent loggingReplace
console.logwithelizaLogger.logto maintain consistent logging practices.- console.log("Token data:", tokenData); + elizaLogger.log("Token data:", tokenData);packages/plugin-solana-agentkit/src/actions/swap.ts (2)
62-66: Implement validation logic invalidatefunctionThe
validatefunction always returnstrue. Consider adding proper validation to ensure the message contains the necessary parameters.- return true; + // TODO: Implement actual validation logic + return isValid; // Replace with appropriate validation result
152-156: Remove duplicate error handling for transaction confirmationThe code checks
confirmation.value.errtwice, which is redundant. Remove the duplicate check to clean up the code.if (confirmation.value.err) { throw new Error( `Transaction failed: ${confirmation.value.err}` ); } - if (confirmation.value.err) { - throw new Error( - `Transaction failed: ${confirmation.value.err}` - ); - }packages/plugin-solana/src/actions/pumpfun.ts (5)
109-112: Simplify transaction handling by removing unnecessary serializationSerializing and then immediately deserializing transactions is redundant. You can send the
versionedTxdirectly without these steps.Apply this diff to streamline the code:
For
createAndBuyToken:versionedTx.sign([mint]); - const serializedTransaction = versionedTx.serialize(); - const serializedTransactionBase64 = Buffer.from( - serializedTransaction - ).toString("base64"); - const deserializedTx = VersionedTransaction.deserialize( - Buffer.from(serializedTransactionBase64, "base64") - ); - const txid = await connection.sendTransaction(deserializedTx, { + const txid = await connection.sendTransaction(versionedTx, {Repeat similar changes for
buyTokenandsellToken.Also applies to: 114-116, 218-223, 224-227, 318-323, 324-327
Line range hint
455-478: Remove commented-out code for cleanlinessThe large block of commented-out code can be removed to improve readability.
- /* - // Generate image if tokenMetadata.file is empty or invalid - if (!tokenMetadata.file || tokenMetadata.file.length < 100) { // Basic validation - try { - const imageResult = await generateImage({ - prompt: `logo for ${tokenMetadata.name} (${tokenMetadata.symbol}) token - ${tokenMetadata.description}`, - width: 512, - height: 512, - count: 1 - }, runtime); - - if (imageResult.success && imageResult.data && imageResult.data.length > 0) { - // Remove the "data:image/png;base64," prefix if present - tokenMetadata.file = imageResult.data[0].replace(/^data:image\/[a-z]+;base64,/, ''); - } else { - elizaLogger.error("Failed to generate image:", imageResult.error); - return false; - } - } catch (error) { - elizaLogger.error("Error generating image:", error); - return false; - } - } */
275-343: Refactor duplicate code inbuyTokenandsellTokenfunctionsThe
buyTokenandsellTokenfunctions share similar structures. Extract common logic into a helper function to enhance maintainability.
539-542: Make network environment configurableThe network is hardcoded as
"devnet". Allow configuring the network through settings to enable flexibility.Apply this diff:
- const sdk = new Fomo(connection, "devnet", deployerKeypair); + const network = runtime.getSetting("SOLANA_NETWORK") || "devnet"; + const sdk = new Fomo(connection, network, deployerKeypair);
618-624: Update example to match action implementationThe example mentions generating a description and buying SOL worth
.buy 0.00069 SOL worth. Ensure the example aligns with the current action's capabilities.packages/plugin-solana/package.json (1)
33-33: Lock the solana-agent-kit version.Using
^1.4.0could lead to unexpected breaking changes. Consider using a fixed version like other dependencies.- "solana-agent-kit": "^1.4.0", + "solana-agent-kit": "1.4.0",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
packages/plugin-solana-agentkit/src/actions/createToken.ts(2 hunks)packages/plugin-solana-agentkit/src/actions/getTokenInfo.ts(1 hunks)packages/plugin-solana-agentkit/src/actions/gibwork.ts(1 hunks)packages/plugin-solana-agentkit/src/actions/lend.ts(1 hunks)packages/plugin-solana-agentkit/src/actions/stake.ts(1 hunks)packages/plugin-solana-agentkit/src/actions/swap.ts(1 hunks)packages/plugin-solana-agentkit/src/actions/transfer.ts(1 hunks)packages/plugin-solana-agentkit/src/client.ts(1 hunks)packages/plugin-solana-agentkit/src/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/plugin-solana-agentkit/src/keypairUtils.ts(1 hunks)packages/plugin-solana/package.json(1 hunks)packages/plugin-solana/src/actions/pumpfun.ts(18 hunks)packages/plugin-solana/src/actions/swap.ts(1 hunks)packages/plugin-solana/src/actions/swapDao.ts(1 hunks)packages/plugin-solana/src/actions/transfer.ts(1 hunks)packages/plugin-solana/src/index.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- packages/plugin-solana/src/actions/transfer.ts
- packages/plugin-solana/src/actions/swapDao.ts
- packages/plugin-solana/src/actions/swap.ts
- packages/plugin-solana/src/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
packages/plugin-solana-agentkit/src/actions/transfer.ts
50-50: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
packages/plugin-solana-agentkit/src/actions/swap.ts
28-28: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
packages/plugin-solana-agentkit/src/actions/gibwork.ts
52-52: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
packages/plugin-solana-agentkit/src/keypairUtils.ts (1)
17-82: Well-structuredgetWalletKeyfunction with comprehensive error handling.The function effectively manages key retrieval based on TEE mode and includes robust error handling for various key formats.
packages/plugin-solana/src/actions/pumpfun.ts (2)
520-524: Ensure secure handling of private keysPrivate keys are retrieved directly from settings. Confirm that sensitive information is stored and accessed securely.
495-496:⚠️ Potential issueVerify the correctness of the metadata upload endpoint
There's a FIXME comment questioning the API endpoint used for metadata upload. Ensure that
https://pump.fun/api/ipfsis valid or update it to the correct endpoint provided byfomo.fund.packages/plugin-solana-agentkit/src/index.ts (1)
3-8: Expand plugin actions to include new functionalitiesNew actions
swap,lend,stake,transfer,getTokenInfo, andgibworkhave been added. Verify that these actions are correctly implemented and integrated.Also applies to: 13-13
packages/plugin-solana-agentkit/src/client.ts (1)
1-23: Ensure correct initialization ofSolanaAgentKitingetSAKThe new
getSAKfunction retrieves the keypair and initializesSolanaAgentKit. Confirm that the keypair retrieval is secure and that the keys match as expected.packages/plugin-solana-agentkit/src/actions/createToken.ts (2)
104-104: LGTM! Improved modularity with getSAK.The refactor to use getSAK utility function enhances code maintainability.
Line range hint
106-111: Address the commented initialSupply parameter.The initialSupply parameter is commented out due to an SDK issue. This needs to be tracked and resolved.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the SDK issue with initialSupply parameter?
packages/plugin-solana-agentkit/src/actions/transfer.ts (3)
134-138: LGTM! Proper PublicKey validation.Good use of PublicKey for validating addresses before transfer.
68-88:⚠️ Potential issueImplement the commented admin validation logic.
The commented-out admin validation logic should be implemented to ensure proper access control for token transfers.
Would you like me to help implement the admin validation logic?
50-50:⚠️ Potential issueRemove API key from example response template.
The example response template contains what appears to be an API key. Replace it with a placeholder value.
- "tokenAddress": "BieefG47jAHCGZBxi2q87RDuHyGZyYC3vAzxpyu8pump", + "tokenAddress": "<token-address>",Likely invalid or redundant comment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
50-50: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
thearyanag
changed the title
|
@coderabbitai security analysis |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @wtfsayo Here's the security analysis of the changes: Key Management:
Input Validation:
Error Handling:
Dependencies:
Configuration:
Overall Risk Assessment: Medium
Would you like me to create GitHub issues for tracking these security improvements? 🔗 Analysis chain🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: Length of output: 2637 Script: Length of output: 82008 ✏️ Learnings added
|
|
its okay @coderabbitai for this plugin |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @wtfsayo Understood! I'll proceed with the review considering the current security implementation as acceptable for this plugin. (｀･ω･´)ゞ |
wtfsayo
changed the title
Relates to:
#1619
Risks
Low
Background
What does this PR do?
Replace the solana plugin with solana agent kit
What kind of change is this?
This PR improves the existing plugin by replacing with the Solana Agent Kit
In following days, will add more actions from the agent kit.
Testing
Where should a reviewer start?
packages/plugin-solanaReference docs https://sendaifun.github.io/solana-agent-kit/
Detailed testing steps
None, automated tests are fine.
Discord username
0xaryan