Standardisation of affiliations and other reccomendations for persistent identifiers #1597
Conversation
Adding ROR as a resource.
Added recommendation to look into ROR
|
@bedroesb let me know if you think this is enough. If I remember correctly "how_to_contribute" does not support tools, but I am sure the ROR entry in the table can be used elsewhere at some point. |
bianchini88
requested review from
wittigue,
bedroesb and
floradanna
as code owners
|
Add ROR to the identifiers page. |
|
Add ROR somewhere on the Identifiers page |
minor fixes in grammar, typos, style
Adding ROR, ORCID, and OFR. (ORCID and OFR will need to be added in the table of resources as well).
Adding ORCID and OFR to the list
bianchini88
requested review from
Nazeeefa,
marikapop and
diana-pilvar
as code owners
Co-authored-by: Bert Droesbeke <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@bianchini88 should changes in pages/your_tasks/identifiers.md be part of this MR?
Two lines of changes in that md file are about ROR but the rest is out of the topic of "Standardisation of affiliations". This good work deserves independent MR :)
|
We can also rename this Pull request :) |
Yes, @marikapop, this was intended to be something much smaller. I can change the title as @bedroesb suggested |
bianchini88
changed the title
bianchini88
changed the title
|
@bedroesb Is it time to merge? |
Closes #1545