Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Security] Periodic testing for security against MKI, for latest Kibana commit #171859

Merged
merged 38 commits into from
Feb 6, 2024

Conversation

dkirchan
Copy link
Contributor

@dkirchan dkirchan commented Nov 23, 2023

Summary

In this PR the Kibana image override is introduced.

The user will be able to decide whether the pipeline will be testing against the code that is already deployed in QA OR if the project will be created with an override from the latest commit in kibana.

This override is created in the first step of the pipeline where a new freshly baked kibana image is built and pushed into docker.elastic.co/kibana-ci/kibana-serverless with tag git-${BUILDKITE_COMMIT:0:12} which is the exact commit checked out in the current build. This is then pushed to the above mentioned registry and as a result an image like docker.elastic.co/kibana-ci/kibana-serverless:git-46iuy423rn3 is being used as the override.

In order to run the tests with the override the environment variable KIBANA_MKI_USE_LATEST_COMMIT=1 needs to be passed when starting the build as shown in the following snippet.

Screenshot 2024-01-23 at 12 49 03 PM

By default, if the environment variable is not passed, the tests will run against the already deployed version in QA without any override.

If only the override flow is picked, then the Build Kibana Image will build and push the new image. On the other hand if the environment variable is absent, then the Build Kibana Image step will exit immediately with exit code 0 (passed in buildkite pipeline) and proceed to run the tests normally.

Checklist

Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR.

Risk Matrix

Delete this section if it is not applicable to this PR.

Before closing this PR, invite QA, stakeholders, and other developers to identify risks that should be tested prior to the change/feature release.

When forming the risk matrix, consider some of the following examples and how they may potentially impact the change:

Risk Probability Severity Mitigation/Notes
Multiple Spaces—unexpected behavior in non-default Kibana Space. Low High Integration tests will verify that all features are still supported in non-default Kibana Space and when user switches between spaces.
Multiple nodes—Elasticsearch polling might have race conditions when multiple Kibana nodes are polling for the same tasks. High Low Tasks are idempotent, so executing them multiple times will not result in logical error, but will degrade performance. To test for this case we add plenty of unit tests around this logic and document manual testing procedure.
Code should gracefully handle cases when feature X or plugin Y are disabled. Medium High Unit tests will verify that any feature flag or plugin combination still results in our service operational.
See more potential risk examples

For maintainers

@dkirchan dkirchan added release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes Team: SecuritySolution Security Solutions Team working on SIEM, Endpoint, Timeline, Resolver, etc. Team:Defend Workflows “EDR Workflows” sub-team of Security Solution Team:Detection Engine Security Solution Detection Engine Area v8.12.0 labels Nov 23, 2023
@dkirchan dkirchan self-assigned this Nov 23, 2023
@dkirchan dkirchan requested a review from a team November 23, 2023 12:58
@apmmachine
Copy link
Contributor

🤖 GitHub comments

Expand to view the GitHub comments

Just comment with:

  • /oblt-deploy : Deploy a Kibana instance using the Observability test environments.
  • /oblt-deploy-serverless : Deploy a serverless Kibana instance using the Observability test environments.
  • run elasticsearch-ci/docs : Re-trigger the docs validation. (use unformatted text in the comment!)

@dkirchan dkirchan force-pushed the security/dkirchan-periodic-qg-integration branch from f79f94a to 6c84bd9 Compare November 30, 2023 14:00
@dkirchan dkirchan marked this pull request as ready for review December 4, 2023 16:34
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/security-solution (Team: SecuritySolution)

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/security-defend-workflows (Team:Defend Workflows)

@dkirchan dkirchan requested a review from yctercero December 4, 2023 16:35
--header "Authorization: ApiKey $QA_API_KEY" \
--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data '{
"name": "ftr-integration-tests-'$random_number'",
"region_id": "aws-eu-west-1"}' | jq '.')
"name": "ftr-integration-tests-'$random_number'",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are we using a random number?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This way it works both against buildkite or locally. Otherwise I should have to do if else statements in bash script to use an alternative for each case of the above. When this will be moved into the normal runner such as parallel_serverless, they can fix it.

);
body.overrides = {
kibana: {
docker_image: `docker.elastic.co/kibana-ci/kibana-serverless:sec-sol-qg-${kibanaOverrideImage}`,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This (docker.elastic.co/kibana-ci/kibana-serverless) is hardcoded in other places as well e.g:

KIBANA_BASE_IMAGE="docker.elastic.co/kibana-ci/kibana-serverless"

I guess its not a problem to be hardcoded for us as well. If you insist though, I can move it definitely to vault.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess it is not then :)

Copy link
Member

@MadameSheema MadameSheema left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @dkirchan :)

@kibana-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

💛 Build succeeded, but was flaky

Failed CI Steps

Test Failures

  • [job] [logs] Investigations - Security Solution Cypress Tests #7 / Basic esql search and filter operations "before each" hook for "should remove the query when the back button is pressed after adding a query" "before each" hook for "should remove the query when the back button is pressed after adding a query"
  • [job] [logs] Defend Workflows Cypress Tests on Serverless #6 / Response console Processes operations: "before all" hook for ""processes" - should obtain a list of processes" "before all" hook for ""processes" - should obtain a list of processes"

Metrics [docs]

✅ unchanged

History

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

cc @dkirchan

@dkirchan dkirchan merged commit 0d92465 into main Feb 6, 2024
45 checks passed
@dkirchan dkirchan deleted the security/dkirchan-periodic-qg-integration branch February 6, 2024 14:56
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

💔 All backports failed

Status Branch Result
8.12 Backport failed because of merge conflicts

You might need to backport the following PRs to 8.12:
- [Security Solution] Specific Cypress executions for Entity Analytics team (#173024)

Manual backport

To create the backport manually run:

node scripts/backport --pr 171859

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

fkanout pushed a commit to fkanout/kibana that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2024
…na commit (elastic#171859)

## Summary

In this PR the Kibana image override is introduced. 

The user will be able to decide whether the pipeline will be testing
against the code that is already deployed in QA **OR** if the project
will be created with an override from the latest commit in kibana.

This override is created in the first step of the pipeline where a new
freshly baked kibana image is built and pushed into
`docker.elastic.co/kibana-ci/kibana-serverless` with tag
`git-${BUILDKITE_COMMIT:0:12}` which is the exact commit checked out in
the current build. This is then pushed to the above mentioned registry
and as a result an image like
`docker.elastic.co/kibana-ci/kibana-serverless:git-46iuy423rn3` is being
used as the override.

In order to run the tests with the override the environment variable
`KIBANA_MKI_USE_LATEST_COMMIT=1` needs to be passed when starting the
build as shown in the following snippet.

![Screenshot 2024-01-23 at 12 49
03 PM](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/assets/55240027/273fe0f9-5dcd-403d-84ce-6c79365916da)

By default, if the environment variable is not passed, the tests will
run against the already deployed version in QA without any override.

**If only** the override flow is picked, then the Build Kibana Image
will build and push the new image. On the other hand if the environment
variable is absent, then the Build Kibana Image step will exit
immediately with exit code 0 (passed in buildkite pipeline) and proceed
to run the tests normally.


### Checklist

Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR.

- [ ] Any text added follows [EUI's writing
guidelines](https://elastic.github.io/eui/#/guidelines/writing), uses
sentence case text and includes [i18n
support](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/packages/kbn-i18n/README.md)
- [ ]
[Documentation](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-documentation.html)
was added for features that require explanation or tutorials
- [ ] [Unit or functional
tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)
were updated or added to match the most common scenarios
- [ ] Any UI touched in this PR is usable by keyboard only (learn more
about [keyboard accessibility](https://webaim.org/techniques/keyboard/))
- [ ] Any UI touched in this PR does not create any new axe failures
(run axe in browser:
[FF](https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/axe-devtools/),
[Chrome](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/axe-web-accessibility-tes/lhdoppojpmngadmnindnejefpokejbdd?hl=en-US))
- [ ] If a plugin configuration key changed, check if it needs to be
allowlisted in the cloud and added to the [docker
list](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/src/dev/build/tasks/os_packages/docker_generator/resources/base/bin/kibana-docker)
- [ ] This renders correctly on smaller devices using a responsive
layout. (You can test this [in your
browser](https://www.browserstack.com/guide/responsive-testing-on-local-server))
- [ ] This was checked for [cross-browser
compatibility](https://www.elastic.co/support/matrix#matrix_browsers)


### Risk Matrix

Delete this section if it is not applicable to this PR.

Before closing this PR, invite QA, stakeholders, and other developers to
identify risks that should be tested prior to the change/feature
release.

When forming the risk matrix, consider some of the following examples
and how they may potentially impact the change:

| Risk | Probability | Severity | Mitigation/Notes |

|---------------------------|-------------|----------|-------------------------|
| Multiple Spaces—unexpected behavior in non-default Kibana Space.
| Low | High | Integration tests will verify that all features are still
supported in non-default Kibana Space and when user switches between
spaces. |
| Multiple nodes—Elasticsearch polling might have race conditions
when multiple Kibana nodes are polling for the same tasks. | High | Low
| Tasks are idempotent, so executing them multiple times will not result
in logical error, but will degrade performance. To test for this case we
add plenty of unit tests around this logic and document manual testing
procedure. |
| Code should gracefully handle cases when feature X or plugin Y are
disabled. | Medium | High | Unit tests will verify that any feature flag
or plugin combination still results in our service operational. |
| [See more potential risk
examples](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/RISK_MATRIX.mdx) |


### For maintainers

- [ ] This was checked for breaking API changes and was [labeled
appropriately](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process)

---------

Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <[email protected]>
@kibanamachine kibanamachine added the backport missing Added to PRs automatically when the are determined to be missing a backport. label Feb 7, 2024
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet.
To create automatically backports add the label auto-backport or prevent reminders by adding the backport:skip label.
You can also create backports manually by running node scripts/backport --pr 171859 locally

3 similar comments
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet.
To create automatically backports add the label auto-backport or prevent reminders by adding the backport:skip label.
You can also create backports manually by running node scripts/backport --pr 171859 locally

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet.
To create automatically backports add the label auto-backport or prevent reminders by adding the backport:skip label.
You can also create backports manually by running node scripts/backport --pr 171859 locally

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet.
To create automatically backports add the label auto-backport or prevent reminders by adding the backport:skip label.
You can also create backports manually by running node scripts/backport --pr 171859 locally

CoenWarmer pushed a commit to CoenWarmer/kibana that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2024
…na commit (elastic#171859)

## Summary

In this PR the Kibana image override is introduced. 

The user will be able to decide whether the pipeline will be testing
against the code that is already deployed in QA **OR** if the project
will be created with an override from the latest commit in kibana.

This override is created in the first step of the pipeline where a new
freshly baked kibana image is built and pushed into
`docker.elastic.co/kibana-ci/kibana-serverless` with tag
`git-${BUILDKITE_COMMIT:0:12}` which is the exact commit checked out in
the current build. This is then pushed to the above mentioned registry
and as a result an image like
`docker.elastic.co/kibana-ci/kibana-serverless:git-46iuy423rn3` is being
used as the override.

In order to run the tests with the override the environment variable
`KIBANA_MKI_USE_LATEST_COMMIT=1` needs to be passed when starting the
build as shown in the following snippet.

![Screenshot 2024-01-23 at 12 49
03 PM](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/assets/55240027/273fe0f9-5dcd-403d-84ce-6c79365916da)

By default, if the environment variable is not passed, the tests will
run against the already deployed version in QA without any override.

**If only** the override flow is picked, then the Build Kibana Image
will build and push the new image. On the other hand if the environment
variable is absent, then the Build Kibana Image step will exit
immediately with exit code 0 (passed in buildkite pipeline) and proceed
to run the tests normally.


### Checklist

Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR.

- [ ] Any text added follows [EUI's writing
guidelines](https://elastic.github.io/eui/#/guidelines/writing), uses
sentence case text and includes [i18n
support](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/packages/kbn-i18n/README.md)
- [ ]
[Documentation](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-documentation.html)
was added for features that require explanation or tutorials
- [ ] [Unit or functional
tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)
were updated or added to match the most common scenarios
- [ ] Any UI touched in this PR is usable by keyboard only (learn more
about [keyboard accessibility](https://webaim.org/techniques/keyboard/))
- [ ] Any UI touched in this PR does not create any new axe failures
(run axe in browser:
[FF](https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/axe-devtools/),
[Chrome](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/axe-web-accessibility-tes/lhdoppojpmngadmnindnejefpokejbdd?hl=en-US))
- [ ] If a plugin configuration key changed, check if it needs to be
allowlisted in the cloud and added to the [docker
list](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/src/dev/build/tasks/os_packages/docker_generator/resources/base/bin/kibana-docker)
- [ ] This renders correctly on smaller devices using a responsive
layout. (You can test this [in your
browser](https://www.browserstack.com/guide/responsive-testing-on-local-server))
- [ ] This was checked for [cross-browser
compatibility](https://www.elastic.co/support/matrix#matrix_browsers)


### Risk Matrix

Delete this section if it is not applicable to this PR.

Before closing this PR, invite QA, stakeholders, and other developers to
identify risks that should be tested prior to the change/feature
release.

When forming the risk matrix, consider some of the following examples
and how they may potentially impact the change:

| Risk | Probability | Severity | Mitigation/Notes |

|---------------------------|-------------|----------|-------------------------|
| Multiple Spaces&mdash;unexpected behavior in non-default Kibana Space.
| Low | High | Integration tests will verify that all features are still
supported in non-default Kibana Space and when user switches between
spaces. |
| Multiple nodes&mdash;Elasticsearch polling might have race conditions
when multiple Kibana nodes are polling for the same tasks. | High | Low
| Tasks are idempotent, so executing them multiple times will not result
in logical error, but will degrade performance. To test for this case we
add plenty of unit tests around this logic and document manual testing
procedure. |
| Code should gracefully handle cases when feature X or plugin Y are
disabled. | Medium | High | Unit tests will verify that any feature flag
or plugin combination still results in our service operational. |
| [See more potential risk
examples](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/RISK_MATRIX.mdx) |


### For maintainers

- [ ] This was checked for breaking API changes and was [labeled
appropriately](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process)

---------

Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <[email protected]>
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet.
To create automatically backports add the label auto-backport or prevent reminders by adding the backport:skip label.
You can also create backports manually by running node scripts/backport --pr 171859 locally

1 similar comment
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet.
To create automatically backports add the label auto-backport or prevent reminders by adding the backport:skip label.
You can also create backports manually by running node scripts/backport --pr 171859 locally

fkanout pushed a commit to fkanout/kibana that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2024
…na commit (elastic#171859)

## Summary

In this PR the Kibana image override is introduced. 

The user will be able to decide whether the pipeline will be testing
against the code that is already deployed in QA **OR** if the project
will be created with an override from the latest commit in kibana.

This override is created in the first step of the pipeline where a new
freshly baked kibana image is built and pushed into
`docker.elastic.co/kibana-ci/kibana-serverless` with tag
`git-${BUILDKITE_COMMIT:0:12}` which is the exact commit checked out in
the current build. This is then pushed to the above mentioned registry
and as a result an image like
`docker.elastic.co/kibana-ci/kibana-serverless:git-46iuy423rn3` is being
used as the override.

In order to run the tests with the override the environment variable
`KIBANA_MKI_USE_LATEST_COMMIT=1` needs to be passed when starting the
build as shown in the following snippet.

![Screenshot 2024-01-23 at 12 49
03 PM](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/assets/55240027/273fe0f9-5dcd-403d-84ce-6c79365916da)

By default, if the environment variable is not passed, the tests will
run against the already deployed version in QA without any override.

**If only** the override flow is picked, then the Build Kibana Image
will build and push the new image. On the other hand if the environment
variable is absent, then the Build Kibana Image step will exit
immediately with exit code 0 (passed in buildkite pipeline) and proceed
to run the tests normally.


### Checklist

Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR.

- [ ] Any text added follows [EUI's writing
guidelines](https://elastic.github.io/eui/#/guidelines/writing), uses
sentence case text and includes [i18n
support](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/packages/kbn-i18n/README.md)
- [ ]
[Documentation](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-documentation.html)
was added for features that require explanation or tutorials
- [ ] [Unit or functional
tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)
were updated or added to match the most common scenarios
- [ ] Any UI touched in this PR is usable by keyboard only (learn more
about [keyboard accessibility](https://webaim.org/techniques/keyboard/))
- [ ] Any UI touched in this PR does not create any new axe failures
(run axe in browser:
[FF](https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/axe-devtools/),
[Chrome](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/axe-web-accessibility-tes/lhdoppojpmngadmnindnejefpokejbdd?hl=en-US))
- [ ] If a plugin configuration key changed, check if it needs to be
allowlisted in the cloud and added to the [docker
list](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/src/dev/build/tasks/os_packages/docker_generator/resources/base/bin/kibana-docker)
- [ ] This renders correctly on smaller devices using a responsive
layout. (You can test this [in your
browser](https://www.browserstack.com/guide/responsive-testing-on-local-server))
- [ ] This was checked for [cross-browser
compatibility](https://www.elastic.co/support/matrix#matrix_browsers)


### Risk Matrix

Delete this section if it is not applicable to this PR.

Before closing this PR, invite QA, stakeholders, and other developers to
identify risks that should be tested prior to the change/feature
release.

When forming the risk matrix, consider some of the following examples
and how they may potentially impact the change:

| Risk | Probability | Severity | Mitigation/Notes |

|---------------------------|-------------|----------|-------------------------|
| Multiple Spaces&mdash;unexpected behavior in non-default Kibana Space.
| Low | High | Integration tests will verify that all features are still
supported in non-default Kibana Space and when user switches between
spaces. |
| Multiple nodes&mdash;Elasticsearch polling might have race conditions
when multiple Kibana nodes are polling for the same tasks. | High | Low
| Tasks are idempotent, so executing them multiple times will not result
in logical error, but will degrade performance. To test for this case we
add plenty of unit tests around this logic and document manual testing
procedure. |
| Code should gracefully handle cases when feature X or plugin Y are
disabled. | Medium | High | Unit tests will verify that any feature flag
or plugin combination still results in our service operational. |
| [See more potential risk
examples](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/RISK_MATRIX.mdx) |


### For maintainers

- [ ] This was checked for breaking API changes and was [labeled
appropriately](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process)

---------

Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <[email protected]>
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet.
To create automatically backports add the label auto-backport or prevent reminders by adding the backport:skip label.
You can also create backports manually by running node scripts/backport --pr 171859 locally

3 similar comments
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet.
To create automatically backports add the label auto-backport or prevent reminders by adding the backport:skip label.
You can also create backports manually by running node scripts/backport --pr 171859 locally

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet.
To create automatically backports add the label auto-backport or prevent reminders by adding the backport:skip label.
You can also create backports manually by running node scripts/backport --pr 171859 locally

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet.
To create automatically backports add the label auto-backport or prevent reminders by adding the backport:skip label.
You can also create backports manually by running node scripts/backport --pr 171859 locally

@jbudz jbudz added the backport:skip This commit does not require backporting label Sep 30, 2024
@kibanamachine kibanamachine removed the backport missing Added to PRs automatically when the are determined to be missing a backport. label Sep 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport:skip This commit does not require backporting release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes Team:Defend Workflows “EDR Workflows” sub-team of Security Solution Team:Detection Engine Security Solution Detection Engine Area Team: SecuritySolution Security Solutions Team working on SIEM, Endpoint, Timeline, Resolver, etc. v8.12.0 v8.13.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants