Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reinstate and skip Dashboard and Visualize tests #15687

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 19, 2017

Conversation

cjcenizal
Copy link
Contributor

This reinstates some tests removed by #15657

@cjcenizal cjcenizal force-pushed the skip-dashboard-tests branch from 99b5017 to 9c8d3d3 Compare December 19, 2017 15:58
@cjcenizal cjcenizal merged commit 3bd256c into elastic:master Dec 19, 2017
@cjcenizal cjcenizal deleted the skip-dashboard-tests branch December 19, 2017 18:23
cjcenizal added a commit to cjcenizal/kibana that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2017
* Reinstate and skip flaky Dashboard view edit tests.
* Reinstate and skip flaky Visualize gauge chart tests.
cjcenizal added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2017
* Reinstate and skip flaky Dashboard view edit tests.
* Reinstate and skip flaky Visualize gauge chart tests.
* Tests add time to the development cycle so we should write as few tests as possible, but no fewer.
* **Unit tests** should cover 70% of our needs. They'll ensure our fundamentals are sound.
* **Integrations tests** should cover 20% of our needs. They'll ensure our units work well together.
* **End-to-end tests** should cover 10% of our needs. They'll ensure our primary user flows are intact and alleviate the burden of manual testing from our QA engineers.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel a bit like these numbers are arbitrary and don't accurately reflect our needs given the state of our code base. End to end tests require updating when our UI/UX changes, but they don't require updating when the inner code changes. Unit tests and integration tests require updating when our code changes, but not when the UI/UX changes. If we had a more stable code base then I think I'd agree that unit tests should be the focus, but we don't. Many of the bugs we actually find in production can't be covered by a unit tests. Unit tests aren't easy to create if the code doesn't have clear boundaries between logic and UI, which many places of our code base don't. In addition, a large portion of our codebase is in a transition from angular to react and undergoing a lot of clean up and refactoring. We should be writing unit tests for new code where possible, but I think code thats undergoing a big refactor means it's even more important to have end to end tests to ensure all the corner cases still work. It also eases the burden on our QA team.

I think a good principle to have is that any time a bug is encountered, write a test that would have caught it, whether it be a unit tests or an integration test, or an end to end test, but don't change the code prior to adding the test. I've been trying to do this and most of the time the only way to cover the test is an end to end test.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants