Prevent cause from being null in ShardOperationFailedException #32640
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ShardOperationFailedException and corresponding implementors seem to suggest that the cause may be null, case that is also handled in a few places. Yet, it does not seem to be possible in practice for the cause to be null, hence we can clean that up and enforce the cause to be a non null value. This is best done by making `ShardOperationFailedException` an abstract class rather than an interface, which holds the basic member instance that all the subclasses have in common and can also enforce that cause, status and reason are non null.
javanna
added
>enhancement
review
:Core/Infra/Core
|
Pinging @elastic/es-core-infra |
javanna
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2018
`ShardOperationFailedException` and corresponding implementors seem to suggest that the cause may be null, case that is also handled in a few places. Yet, it does not seem to be possible in practice for the cause to be null, hence we can clean that up and enforce the cause to be a non null value. This is best done by making `ShardOperationFailedException` an abstract class rather than an interface, which holds the basic member instance that all the subclasses have in common and can also enforce that cause, status and reason are non null.
javanna
added a commit
to javanna/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 27, 2018
As part of recent changes made to `ShardOperationFailedException` we introduced `index` and `shardId` members to the base class, but the subclasses are entirely responsible for the serialization of such fields. In the case of `ShardSearchFailure`, we have an additional `SearchShardTarget` instance member which also holds the index and the shardId, hence they get serialized as part of `SearchShardTarget` itself. When de-serializing a `ShardSearchFailure` though, we need to remember to also set the parent class `index` and `shardId` fields otherwise they get lost Relates to elastic#32640
javanna
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 27, 2018
As part of recent changes made to `ShardOperationFailedException` we introduced `index` and `shardId` members to the base class, but the subclasses are entirely responsible for the serialization of such fields. In the case of `ShardSearchFailure`, we have an additional `SearchShardTarget` instance member which also holds the index and the shardId, hence they get serialized as part of `SearchShardTarget` itself. When de-serializing a `ShardSearchFailure` though, we need to remember to also set the parent class `index` and `shardId` fields otherwise they get lost Relates to #32640
javanna
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2018
As part of recent changes made to `ShardOperationFailedException` we introduced `index` and `shardId` members to the base class, but the subclasses are entirely responsible for the serialization of such fields. In the case of `ShardSearchFailure`, we have an additional `SearchShardTarget` instance member which also holds the index and the shardId, hence they get serialized as part of `SearchShardTarget` itself. When de-serializing a `ShardSearchFailure` though, we need to remember to also set the parent class `index` and `shardId` fields otherwise they get lost Relates to #32640
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ShardOperationFailedExceptionand corresponding implementors seem to suggest that the cause may be null, case that is also handled in a few places. Yet, it does not seem to be possible in practice for the cause to be null, hence we can clean that up and enforce the cause to be a non null value. This is best done by makingShardOperationFailedExceptionan abstract class rather than an interface, which holds the instance members that all the subclasses have in common and can also enforce that cause, status and reason are non null. Such change also allows to share common code between the different subclasses.Relates to #32608 where this was uncovered and a test was added for the case where cause is null, test that can now be removed..