Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update allocation awareness docs #29116

Conversation

DaveCTurner
Copy link
Contributor

Today, the docs imply that if multiple attributes are specified the the
whole combination of values is considered as a single entity when
performing allocation. In fact, each attribute is considered separately. This
change fixes this discrepancy.

It also replaces the use of the term "awareness zone" with "zone or domain", and
reformats some paragraphs to the right width.

Fixes #29105

Today, the docs imply that if multiple attributes are specified the the
whole combination of values is considered as a single entity when
performing allocation. In fact, each attribute is considered separately. This
change fixes this discrepancy.

It also replaces the use of the term "awareness zone" with "zone or domain", and
reformats some paragraphs to the right width.

Fixes elastic#29105
@DaveCTurner DaveCTurner added >bug >docs General docs changes v7.0.0 v6.3.0 v6.0.3 v6.1.4 v6.2.3 :Distributed Coordination/Allocation All issues relating to the decision making around placing a shard (both master logic & on the nodes) v5.6.9 labels Mar 16, 2018
@DaveCTurner DaveCTurner requested a review from bleskes March 16, 2018 16:57
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-distributed

@DaveCTurner DaveCTurner removed the request for review from bleskes March 17, 2018 12:03
@DaveCTurner DaveCTurner merged commit 7608480 into elastic:master Mar 19, 2018
DaveCTurner added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2018
Update allocation awareness docs

Today, the docs imply that if multiple attributes are specified the the
whole combination of values is considered as a single entity when
performing allocation. In fact, each attribute is considered separately. This
change fixes this discrepancy.

It also replaces the use of the term "awareness zone" with "zone or domain", and
reformats some paragraphs to the right width.

Fixes #29105
DaveCTurner added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2018
Update allocation awareness docs

Today, the docs imply that if multiple attributes are specified the the
whole combination of values is considered as a single entity when
performing allocation. In fact, each attribute is considered separately. This
change fixes this discrepancy.

It also replaces the use of the term "awareness zone" with "zone or domain", and
reformats some paragraphs to the right width.

Fixes #29105
DaveCTurner added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2018
Update allocation awareness docs

Today, the docs imply that if multiple attributes are specified the the
whole combination of values is considered as a single entity when
performing allocation. In fact, each attribute is considered separately. This
change fixes this discrepancy.

It also replaces the use of the term "awareness zone" with "zone or domain", and
reformats some paragraphs to the right width.

Fixes #29105
DaveCTurner added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2018
Update allocation awareness docs

Today, the docs imply that if multiple attributes are specified the the
whole combination of values is considered as a single entity when
performing allocation. In fact, each attribute is considered separately. This
change fixes this discrepancy.

It also replaces the use of the term "awareness zone" with "zone or domain", and
reformats some paragraphs to the right width.

Fixes #29105
DaveCTurner added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2018
Update allocation awareness docs

Today, the docs imply that if multiple attributes are specified the the
whole combination of values is considered as a single entity when
performing allocation. In fact, each attribute is considered separately. This
change fixes this discrepancy.

It also replaces the use of the term "awareness zone" with "zone or domain", and
reformats some paragraphs to the right width.

Fixes #29105
jasontedor added a commit to jasontedor/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2018
* master: (476 commits)
  Fix compilation errors in ML integration tests
  Small code cleanups and refactorings in persistent tasks (elastic#29109)
  Update allocation awareness docs (elastic#29116)
  Configure error file for archive packages (elastic#29129)
  Configure heap dump path for archive packages (elastic#29130)
  Client: Add missing test
  getMinGenerationForSeqNo should acquire read lock (elastic#29126)
  Backport - Do not renew sync-id PR to 5.6 and 6.3
  Client: Wrap SSLHandshakeException in sync calls
  Fix creating keystore when upgrading (elastic#29121)
  Align thread pool info to thread pool configuration (elastic#29123)
  TEST: Adjust translog size assumption in new engine
  Docs: HighLevelRestClient#multiGet (elastic#29095)
  Client: Wrap synchronous exceptions (elastic#28919)
  REST: Clear Indices Cache API simplify param parsing (elastic#29111)
  Fix typo in ExceptionSerializationTests
  Remove BWC layer for rejected execution exception
  Fix EsAbortPolicy to conform to API (elastic#29075)
  [DOCS] Removed prerelease footnote from upgrade table.
  Docs: Support triple quotes (elastic#28915)
  ...
@DaveCTurner DaveCTurner deleted the 2018-03-16-fix-allocation-awareness-docs branch July 23, 2022 10:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
>bug :Distributed Coordination/Allocation All issues relating to the decision making around placing a shard (both master logic & on the nodes) >docs General docs changes v5.6.9 v6.0.3 v6.1.4 v6.2.3 v6.3.0 v7.0.0-beta1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incorrect documentation about multiple awareness attributes
4 participants