Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skip sending ShardActiveRequest checks in stateless nodes #121387

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 6, 2025

Conversation

fcofdez
Copy link
Contributor

@fcofdez fcofdez commented Jan 31, 2025

Stateless node rely on an external blob store to persist data, therefor it's not necessary to go through such checks when a shard store should be deleted.

Closes ES-10577

Stateless node rely on an external blob store to persist data, therefor
it's not necessary to go through such checks when a shard store
should be deleted.

Closes ES-10577
@fcofdez fcofdez added >non-issue :Distributed Indexing/Store Issues around managing unopened Lucene indices. If it touches Store.java, this is a likely label. Team:Distributed Indexing Meta label for Distributed Indexing team labels Jan 31, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-distributed-indexing (Team:Distributed Indexing)


private void deleteShardStoreOnApplierThread(ShardId shardId, long clusterStateVersion) {
clusterService.getClusterApplierService()
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it wouldn't be necessary to run this on the applier thread, but I wanted to keep the changes minimal.

@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added the serverless-linked Added by automation, don't add manually label Jan 31, 2025
@fcofdez
Copy link
Contributor Author

fcofdez commented Jan 31, 2025

@elasticmachine update branch

@fcofdez
Copy link
Contributor Author

fcofdez commented Feb 6, 2025

@elasticmachine update branch

Copy link
Contributor

@henningandersen henningandersen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@fcofdez fcofdez merged commit 0015d56 into elastic:main Feb 6, 2025
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Distributed Indexing/Store Issues around managing unopened Lucene indices. If it touches Store.java, this is a likely label. >non-issue serverless-linked Added by automation, don't add manually Team:Distributed Indexing Meta label for Distributed Indexing team v9.1.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants