-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make field limit more predictable #102885
Merged
elasticsearchmachine
merged 10 commits into
elastic:main
from
felixbarny:field-limit-count-fields-not-mappers
Feb 6, 2024
Merged
Changes from 8 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f9f19ef
Make field limit more predictable
felixbarny 7b227bb
Add test case for multi-field inside a multi-field
felixbarny e96cb64
Update docs/changelog/102885.yaml
felixbarny bc3542f
Add assertWarnings to LegacyGeoShapeFieldMapperTests
felixbarny 37eadb6
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into field-limit-count-fie…
felixbarny eb9ae17
Fix exceedsLimit
felixbarny 99eb652
Remove unnecessary getRootObjectMapperBuilder method
felixbarny 1f70c52
Apply spotless suggestions
felixbarny c89daa3
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into field-limit-count-fie…
felixbarny fd41e67
Update DocumentParserContext to use new method name
felixbarny File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
pr: 102885 | ||
summary: Make field limit more predictable | ||
area: Mapping | ||
type: enhancement | ||
issues: [] |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ private CacheKey() {} | |
private final List<FieldMapper> indexTimeScriptMappers; | ||
private final Mapping mapping; | ||
private final Set<String> completionFields; | ||
private final int totalFieldsCount; | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Creates a new {@link MappingLookup} instance by parsing the provided mapping and extracting its field definitions. | ||
|
@@ -127,6 +128,7 @@ private MappingLookup( | |
Collection<ObjectMapper> objectMappers, | ||
Collection<FieldAliasMapper> aliasMappers | ||
) { | ||
this.totalFieldsCount = mapping.getRoot().getTotalFieldsCount(); | ||
this.mapping = mapping; | ||
Map<String, Mapper> fieldMappers = new HashMap<>(); | ||
Map<String, ObjectMapper> objects = new HashMap<>(); | ||
|
@@ -223,6 +225,14 @@ FieldTypeLookup fieldTypesLookup() { | |
* Returns the total number of fields defined in the mappings, including field mappers, object mappers as well as runtime fields. | ||
*/ | ||
public long getTotalFieldsCount() { | ||
return totalFieldsCount; | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Returns the total number of mappers defined in the mappings, including field mappers and their sub-fields | ||
* (which are not explicitly defined in the mappings), multi-fields, object mappers, runtime fields and metadata field mappers. | ||
*/ | ||
public long getTotalMapperCount() { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think I can no longer tell the difference between getTotalFieldsCount and getTotalMapperCount . It's very subtle, or is there any difference at all? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. |
||
return fieldMappers.size() + objectMappers.size() + runtimeFieldMappersCount; | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
@@ -282,7 +292,7 @@ void checkFieldLimit(long limit, int additionalFieldsToAdd) { | |
} | ||
|
||
boolean exceedsLimit(long limit, int additionalFieldsToAdd) { | ||
return getTotalFieldsCount() + additionalFieldsToAdd - mapping.getSortedMetadataMappers().length > limit; | ||
return totalFieldsCount + additionalFieldsToAdd > limit; | ||
} | ||
|
||
private void checkDimensionFieldLimit(long limit) { | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see here that we are counting aliases as one...wouldn't it make sense to skip aliases not counting them?
Considering also that we might use (extensively) passthrough fields #103648
probably it might make sense not to count them.