Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(fips): Disable encrypted private key support when in FIPS mode #278

Merged

Conversation

michel-laterman
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Disable support for encrypted private keys when built in FIPS mode.

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

@michel-laterman michel-laterman added enhancement New feature or request Team:Elastic-Agent-Control-Plane Label for the Agent Control Plane team labels Feb 12, 2025
@michel-laterman michel-laterman requested a review from a team as a code owner February 12, 2025 20:01
@michel-laterman michel-laterman requested review from belimawr and rdner and removed request for a team February 12, 2025 20:01
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

💚 Build Succeeded

@michel-laterman michel-laterman merged commit 977d131 into elastic:main Feb 12, 2025
7 checks passed
@michel-laterman michel-laterman deleted the fips-disable-encrypted-key branch February 12, 2025 22:05
Copy link
Contributor

@simitt simitt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for being late with the review - @michel-laterman can you please create another PR with a test for fips mode, ensuring that errors are returned.
Created #280 for tracking this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Team:Elastic-Agent-Control-Plane Label for the Agent Control Plane team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants