Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[dev guide] Add docs on optional schema arguments #12371
[dev guide] Add docs on optional schema arguments #12371
Changes from 2 commits
65d2cc1
ca869dd
cb799a6
aabbe56
01eccba
ba5720c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure why "Schema Option" is capitalized here. Generally we only capitalize proper nouns. I would change this to say, "If no schema option is set, the field is required."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
More than likely, I was looking at the code, which is capitalized, and my brain just translated it to words that way, hah.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I understand why you are being precise here, but I think the content is harder to read when you swap between using "non-optional" and "not required." Except in situations where it's important to know that a setting is explicit (like you do later on where you say "field explicitly marked as
required
"), I would simply refer to a fields as required or optional. I'll suggest edits with this notion in mind. I hope I'm understanding things correctly.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yah, I was struggling to word that in a way that didn't seem repetitive.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you want to disambiguate further, you could add "...any required field is missing, including fields that are required because no schema option is set."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yah, that's what I was trying to get across. Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This sentence was a little hard to parse on first reading. Would it be accurate to say "...will pass a callback function that returns a list of missing keys for more fine-grained error handling."