Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add AutoEvent Retention Model and DTO #975

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2025

Conversation

weichou1229
Copy link
Member

@weichou1229 weichou1229 commented Feb 6, 2025

Add AutoEvent Retention Model and DTO for event retention enhancement

If your build fails due to your commit message not passing the build checks, please review the guidelines here: https://github.com/edgexfoundry/go-mod-core-contracts/blob/main/.github/Contributing.md

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • I am not introducing a breaking change (if you are, flag in conventional commit message with BREAKING CHANGE: describing the break)
  • I am not introducing a new dependency (add notes below if you are)
  • I have added unit tests for the new feature or bug fix (if not, why?) not impact
  • I have fully tested (add details below) this the new feature or bug fix (if not, why?)
  • I have opened a PR for the related docs change (if not, why?) feat: Update Event Retention doc edgex-docs#1415

Testing Instructions

New Dependency Instructions (If applicable)

@weichou1229 weichou1229 marked this pull request as ready for review February 7, 2025 12:42
@weichou1229 weichou1229 requested a review from cloudxxx8 February 7, 2025 12:42
Add AutoEvent Retention Model and DTO for event retention enhancement

Signed-off-by: bruce <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@cloudxxx8 cloudxxx8 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@cloudxxx8 cloudxxx8 merged commit ed67b12 into edgexfoundry:main Feb 10, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants