Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revise: fix QString::split(...) for older Qt Versions #113

Merged

Conversation

SlySven
Copy link
Contributor

@SlySven SlySven commented Oct 27, 2020

A use of the above in the test code fails to build on anything older than Qt 5.14 as the enum used is only present in that and newer versions. Previously the enum was a member of the QString class rather than the Qt namespace...

Signed-off-by: Stephen Lyons [email protected]

A use of the above in the test code fails to build on anything older than
Qt 5.14 as the `enum` used is only present in that and newer versions.
Previously the `enum` was a member of the `QString` class rather than the
`Qt` namespace...

Signed-off-by: Stephen Lyons <[email protected]>
@SlySven
Copy link
Contributor Author

SlySven commented Oct 27, 2020

For some reason the CI tests (that the Mudlet team inserted into the code base in 47f970c) on Linux run against Qt 5.6 (it seems) so are thus borked currently...

@SlySven
Copy link
Contributor Author

SlySven commented Oct 27, 2020

@gamecreature What is the minimum Qt version that you intend (or would like) the edbee-lib library to compile with?

@gamecreature
Copy link
Member

gamecreature commented Oct 27, 2020

Thank you!!
I don't have a special wish for what the minimum version is. I will adjust for Mudlet if required... (Though I don't have the time to test every version)
The only requirement I have is that it will run on the latest Qt..
So If you've got issues with Mudlet please let me know, and we can add workarounds like the one above!

@gamecreature gamecreature merged commit 5dbc329 into edbee:master Oct 27, 2020
@SlySven
Copy link
Contributor Author

SlySven commented Oct 27, 2020

I don't have a special wish for what the minimum version is.

Well, it might be worth coding to at lest consider the oldest current LTS version (currently that is QT 5.12.8 IIRC with an EOL 2020/12/05)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qt_version_history#Qt_5 is probably worth bookmarking...

@gamecreature
Copy link
Member

@SlySven I agree on this. I think LTS is a good lowest version to aim for. (Sorry for the late response).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants