Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

change back checksum for libdap 3.19.1 #6305

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2018

Conversation

boegel
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel commented May 8, 2018

This reverts commit 19d037e (PR #5473), since apparently the original tarball was re-instated (on Dec 28th 2017, if the timestamp in https://www.opendap.org/pub/source/ can be trusted).

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented May 8, 2018

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2581.golett.os - Linux centos linux 7.4.1708, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/3789f80cd1ce2d072203dc6242db6ad2 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented May 8, 2018

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2082.delcatty.os - Linux centos linux 7.4.1708, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/4442935f0618c3367ce79bca7d1b0056 for a full test report.

@vanzod
Copy link
Member

vanzod commented May 8, 2018

Test report by @vanzod
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
cermis - Linux debian 9.4, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz, Python 2.7.13
See https://gist.github.com/c6a58f944e6d8d1e0c659cd48824c1b1 for a full test report.

@vanzod
Copy link
Member

vanzod commented May 8, 2018

Going in, thanks @boegel!

@vanzod vanzod merged commit 310895b into easybuilders:develop May 8, 2018
@boegel boegel deleted the libdap_checksum branch May 8, 2018 19:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants