Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FLINT needs BLAS so move it up from GCC level #17868

Merged

Conversation

akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor

(created using eb --new-pr)
FLINT depends on BLAS so it must be higher than GCC. It also depends on NTL.

@akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor Author

Replaces #17867
This is part 1 of 2

They should be at gfbf/foss level depending on toolchain version due to BLAS being a depedency.
@akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor Author

@boegelbot Please test @ jsc-zen2

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@akesandgren: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=17868 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --mem-per-cpu=4000M --job-name test_PR_17868 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 2582

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1536284345 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor Author

Replacement Arb/polymake in #17869

@akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @akesandgren
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in total)
b-an02.hpc2n.umu.se - Linux Ubuntu 20.04, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v4 @ 2.60GHz, Python 3.8.10
See https://gist.github.com/akesandgren/3b93f92e64a9d9a4c94ed2d3c40f42d5 for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/74e6573bd7e17d0ede236479a6820733 for a full test report.

@jfgrimm
Copy link
Member

jfgrimm commented May 5, 2023

Test report by @jfgrimm
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (4 easyconfigs in total)
node088.pri.viking.alces.network - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6138 CPU @ 2.00GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/jfgrimm/16e48b7f59c617242b4b1de8e904e9c8 for a full test report.

@verdurin
Copy link
Member

verdurin commented May 5, 2023

Test report by @verdurin
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in total)
easybuild-c7.novalocal - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/verdurin/6ad8ba23d02d0ad35f28befac0ccb7af for a full test report.

@jfgrimm
Copy link
Member

jfgrimm commented May 6, 2023

@boegelbot Please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@jfgrimm: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=17868 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_17868 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 10755

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1537144837 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/e1e7b65a6c14c225db333ac090e7a144 for a full test report.

@jfgrimm jfgrimm modified the milestones: 4.x, next release (4.7.2) May 6, 2023
Copy link
Member

@jfgrimm jfgrimm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@jfgrimm
Copy link
Member

jfgrimm commented May 6, 2023

Going in, thanks @akesandgren!

@jfgrimm jfgrimm merged commit c0fa570 into easybuilders:develop May 6, 2023
@akesandgren akesandgren deleted the 20230505153715_new_pr_FLINT284 branch May 8, 2023 05:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants