{lib}[GCC/11.2.0] MultilevelEstimators v0.1.0 w/ Python 3.9.6 + Julia 1.7.2

[ItIsI-Orient]

(created using eb --new-pr)
Required:

• add generic JuliaPackage easyblock easybuild-easyblocks#2816

[boegel]

@ItIsI-Orient JSC has an easyblock available for installing Julia packages "properly", we should probably be using that too, cfr. https://github.com/easybuilders/JSC/blob/2022/Custom_EasyBlocks/juliapackage.py

@SebastianAchilles Are you up for looking into contributing that centrally to EasyBuild?
Except for the EBJULIA stuff, it looks pretty generic at first sight?

[ItIsI-Orient]

@SebastianAchilles So I have tried and played around with the easyblock, but there appears to be something wrong... When I try and use it as is, I get error saying ERROR: The following package names could not be resolved: MultilevelEstimators (not found in project, manifest or registry). I wonder what may cause that and I hope that it isn't caused by the fact, that "MultilevelEstimators is not (yet) registered in METADATA.jl" according to their github repo. So I have read through the easyblock, tried to mess with few things and after feeding the command URL of the repo (used this: julia --eval 'using Pkg; Pkg.add(PackageSpec(name="MultilevelEstimators", version="0.1.0", url="https://github.com/PieterjanRobbe/MultilevelEstimators.jl"))') all I got is a following error ERROR: version specification invalid when tracking a repository: '0.1.0' specified for package 'MultilevelEstimators'. So I believe that we will have to come up with a way to do proper version control... I will try to mess with it more to find out how exact I can be with the URL.

[verdurin]

I have a request for an application built using Julia, so would be interested in progress here.

[ItIsI-Orient]

@SebastianAchilles Is there any progress on this one? I seem to be kinda stumped here so any help would be appreciated.

[jfgrimm]

As decided in issue #16330, we have deprecated the use of True to signify a system-toolchain dependency (#16384), in favour of the more intuitive SYSTEM template constant. Due to the change in the test suite, please run eb --sync-pr-with-develop 15630 and update the PR to use SYSTEM instead.

[boegel]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 2816"

[boegelbot]

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=15630 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 2816" EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_15630 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 9455

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1306854038 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2816
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns2 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/7b41860c7f6773305afe194f1f188243 for a full test report.

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2816
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3135.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 8.4, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/b67e4e15910b8c0ccdf78a897ab16f0e for a full test report.

[lexming]

@boegelbot: please test @ generoso
EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 2816"

[boegelbot]

@lexming: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=15630 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 2816" EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_15630 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 9495

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1310419627 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2816
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/7160b69980f82593987690741e0d6b89 for a full test report.

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2816
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node3139.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 8.4, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/b6e5b6551c65817294d383ac418529b8 for a full test report.

[boegel]

Going in, thanks @ItIsI-Orient!