Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{toolchain} fosscuda/2020a #11424

Conversation

bartoldeman
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

…c-2020a-mpi.eb, fosscuda-2020a.eb, HPL-2.3-fosscuda-2020a.eb
@bartoldeman bartoldeman force-pushed the 20201002142737_new_pr_ScaLAPACK210 branch from 06f339e to a428858 Compare October 2, 2020 15:01
@bartoldeman
Copy link
Contributor Author

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@bartoldeman: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=11424 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_11424 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 8003

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 702795042 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@bartoldeman bartoldeman added this to the next release (4.3.1) milestone Oct 2, 2020
@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in this PR)
generoso-x-3 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/e811d2a11cc453af6e92b4463adabfe7 for a full test report.

@bartoldeman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @bartoldeman
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in this PR)
build-node.computecanada.ca - Linux centos linux 7.8.2003, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS), Python 3.7.7
See https://gist.github.com/45d8ddd955741354878f6a9e6370b356 for a full test report.

@zao
Copy link
Contributor

zao commented Oct 5, 2020

Test report by @zao
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in this PR)
freja - Linux Ubuntu 20.04, x86_64, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8700K CPU @ 3.70GHz, Python 3.8.2
See https://gist.github.com/d715a803cefd26b3685e53a3ad6d6c95 for a full test report.

@verdurin
Copy link
Member

verdurin commented Oct 5, 2020

Test report by @verdurin
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 12 out of 12 (4 easyconfigs in this PR)
easybuild.novalocal - Linux centos linux 7.8.2003, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/644670f1365e7c930e7cf3818e184459 for a full test report.

Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Oct 5, 2020

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in this PR)
node3404.kirlia.os - Linux centos linux 7.8.2003, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6240 CPU @ 2.60GHz (cascadelake), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/2c72d135f48fedabe3c5be334adc8230 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Oct 6, 2020

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 4 out of 4 (4 easyconfigs in this PR)
node3502.doduo.os - Linux RHEL 8.2, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7302P 16-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/4a4e96be3d5b70acb2a50f7cd050e217 for a full test report.

Copy link
Member

@verdurin verdurin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine.

@verdurin
Copy link
Member

verdurin commented Oct 6, 2020

Going in, thanks @bartoldeman!

@verdurin verdurin merged commit ad0dbba into easybuilders:develop Oct 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants