Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{chem}[intel/2019b] QuantumESPRESSO v6.6 #11085

Conversation

migueldiascosta
Copy link
Member

@migueldiascosta migueldiascosta commented Aug 11, 2020

(created using eb --new-pr)

requires easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#2112

WIP because qe-gipaw 6.6 isn't out yet

@migueldiascosta migueldiascosta changed the title {chem}[intel/2019b] QuantumESPRESSO v6.6 {chem}[intel/2019b] QuantumESPRESSO v6.6 (WIP) Aug 11, 2020
@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @migueldiascosta
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
sms - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core Processor (zen), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/c41e3e6b25234778725ceafd09c23974 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Aug 15, 2020

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

EB_ARGS=--include-easyblocks-from-pr 2112

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Aug 15, 2020

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
node3411.kirlia.os - Linux centos linux 7.8.2003, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6240 CPU @ 2.60GHz (cascadelake), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/51dffbc9df24aba497d013777fa004e8 for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=11085 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 2112" /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_11085 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 5049

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 674375567 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
generoso-x-2 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/b265bc04957a291613bf73adc447144e for a full test report.

@boegel boegel added this to the next release (4.2.3?) milestone Aug 15, 2020
@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @migueldiascosta
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
sms - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core Processor (zen), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/2fee09d64088cbba4aa3f7a7ec8c2cff for a full test report.

@migueldiascosta migueldiascosta changed the title {chem}[intel/2019b] QuantumESPRESSO v6.6 (WIP) {chem}[intel/2019b] QuantumESPRESSO v6.6 Sep 9, 2020
@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Member Author

propose to go ahead without gipaw and update the easyconfig once the 6.6. version is released

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Sep 9, 2020

@migueldiascosta Makes sense to me...

Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Sep 9, 2020

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in this PR)
node3152.skitty.os - Linux centos linux 7.8.2003, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/b1d38e56c4269ce4cd4825456212e3cd for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Sep 9, 2020

Going in, thanks @migueldiascosta!

@boegel boegel merged commit f3f63ec into easybuilders:develop Sep 9, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants