Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[22893] Implementation of modules for IDLs #5691

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

juanjo4936
Copy link
Contributor

@juanjo4936 juanjo4936 commented Mar 6, 2025

In this PR we implement the capabilities to resolve the module structure in IDL types, so they are written in a nested structure. A new function is introduced to resolve the structure, and the final writing of the IDL is modified to accommodate the new structure.

@Mergifyio backport 3.1.x

Contributor Checklist

  • Commit messages follow the project guidelines.
  • The code follows the style guidelines of this project.
  • Tests that thoroughly check the new feature have been added/Regression tests checking the bug and its fix have been added; the added tests pass locally
  • Any new/modified methods have been properly documented using Doxygen.
  • Any new configuration API has an equivalent XML API (with the corresponding XSD extension)
  • Changes are backport compatible: they do NOT break ABI nor change library core behavior.
  • Changes are API compatible.
  • New feature has been added to the versions.md file (if applicable).
  • New feature has been documented/Current behavior is correctly described in the documentation.
  • Applicable backports have been included in the description.

Reviewer Checklist

  • The PR has a milestone assigned.
  • The title and description correctly express the PR's purpose.
  • Check contributor checklist is correct.
  • If this is a critical bug fix, backports to the critical-only supported branches have been requested.
  • Check CI results: changes do not issue any warning.
  • Check CI results: failing tests are unrelated with the changes.

@juanjo4936 juanjo4936 requested a review from richiprosima March 6, 2025 15:06
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ci-pending PR which CI is running label Mar 6, 2025
@juanjo4936 juanjo4936 marked this pull request as ready for review March 7, 2025 12:55
@juanjo4936 juanjo4936 requested review from richiprosima and removed request for richiprosima March 7, 2025 12:55
Signed-off-by: Juanjo Garcia <[email protected]>
@juanjo4936 juanjo4936 requested review from richiprosima and removed request for richiprosima March 7, 2025 13:04
@juanjo4936 juanjo4936 added this to the v3.2.0 milestone Mar 7, 2025
@juanjo4936 juanjo4936 requested review from richiprosima and removed request for richiprosima March 7, 2025 13:06
@juanjo4936 juanjo4936 modified the milestone: v3.2.0 Mar 7, 2025
@juanjo4936 juanjo4936 requested review from richiprosima and removed request for richiprosima March 7, 2025 13:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci-pending PR which CI is running
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant