[StyleCleanUp] Static holder types should be static or sealed (CA1052)
#10718
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dotnet-policy-service
bot
requested review from
dipeshmsft,
singhashish-wpf and
Kuldeep-MS
dotnet-policy-service
bot
added
PR
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently blocked via #10680 hence draft.
Fixes #10717
Description
Fixes classes (usually) with private ctors to be
staticorsealed(in case of singletons).Customer Impact
Cleaner codebase for developers.
Regression
No.
Testing
Local build.
Risk
Low, these are all
internalclasses.Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow