Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[main] Update dependencies from dotnet/linker #28796

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 2, 2022

Conversation

dotnet-maestro[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dotnet-maestro dotnet-maestro bot commented Oct 27, 2022

This pull request updates the following dependencies

From https://github.com/dotnet/linker

  • Subscription: 4a865c13-5e52-41f5-3916-08d8e9750bf8
  • Build: 20221102.1
  • Date Produced: November 2, 2022 4:20:46 PM UTC
  • Commit: 391ac60bbfb2c618b82f08af728d2d4d259d584e
  • Branch: refs/heads/main

…027.1

Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers , Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks
 From Version 7.0.100-1.22525.3 -> To Version 7.0.100-1.22527.1
@dotnet-maestro
Copy link
Contributor Author

Notification for subscribed users from https://github.com/dotnet/linker:

@dotnet/linker-contrib

Action requested: Please take a look at this failing automated dependency-flow pull request's checks; failures may be related to changes which originated in your repo.

  • This pull request contains changes from your source repo (https://github.com/dotnet/linker) and seems to have failed checks in this PR. Please take a peek at the failures and comment if they seem relevant to your changes.
  • If you're being tagged in this comment it is due to an entry in the related Maestro Subscription of the Build Asset Registry. If you feel this entry has added your GitHub login or your GitHub team in error, please update the subscription to reflect this.
  • For more details, please read the Arcade Darc documentation

…027.2

Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers , Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks
 From Version 7.0.100-1.22525.3 -> To Version 7.0.100-1.22527.2
…027.4

Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers , Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks
 From Version 7.0.100-1.22525.3 -> To Version 7.0.100-1.22527.4
@build-analysis build-analysis bot mentioned this pull request Oct 28, 2022
2 tasks
@v-wuzhai
Copy link
Member

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

…031.1

Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers , Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks
 From Version 7.0.100-1.22525.3 -> To Version 7.0.100-1.22531.1
…031.2

Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers , Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks
 From Version 7.0.100-1.22525.3 -> To Version 7.0.100-1.22531.2
@dsplaisted
Copy link
Member

@TanayParikh @javiercn @agocke Some Blazor tests are failing with this linker insertion, could someone take a look?

@agocke
Copy link
Member

agocke commented Nov 1, 2022

@jtschuster Could you take a look and see if anything changed here?

@TanayParikh
Copy link
Contributor

TanayParikh commented Nov 1, 2022

@TanayParikh @javiercn @agocke Some Blazor tests are failing with this linker insertion, could someone take a look?

System.Private.Xml.Linq.dll, System.Private.Xml.dll, System.Linq.Expressions.dll and System.Xml.Linq.dll were added. Is this expected?

@jtschuster
Copy link
Member

System.Private.Xml.Linq.dll, System.Private.Xml.dll and System.Xml.Linq.dll were added. Is this expected?

I don't think so, pretty sure it's fully a linker issue, I have a change almost ready that should fix that issue.

@TanayParikh
Copy link
Contributor

Updated baselines if the changes are expected: #28842

…101.1

Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers , Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks
 From Version 7.0.100-1.22525.3 -> To Version 7.0.100-1.22551.1
…102.1

Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Analyzers , Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks
 From Version 7.0.100-1.22525.3 -> To Version 7.0.100-1.22552.1
@marcpopMSFT marcpopMSFT merged commit bd62912 into main Nov 2, 2022
@marcpopMSFT marcpopMSFT deleted the darc-main-838e5259-5c2b-4257-b4b8-265d98d871eb branch November 2, 2022 21:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants