Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Delete the Unix x64 implicit byref quirk #70961

Merged

Conversation

SingleAccretion
Copy link
Contributor

@SingleAccretion SingleAccretion commented Jun 19, 2022

Diffs - some improvements, with some regressions in a particular family of methods because gtSetEvalOrder swaps things in a way that upsets the RA.

@ghost ghost added the community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member label Jun 19, 2022
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Jun 19, 2022
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 19, 2022

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

A small CQ improvement for Unix x64.

Author: SingleAccretion
Assignees: -
Labels:

area-CodeGen-coreclr, community-contribution

Milestone: -

@SingleAccretion SingleAccretion marked this pull request as ready for review June 20, 2022 10:21
@SingleAccretion
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dotnet/jit-contrib

@jakobbotsch jakobbotsch merged commit 51b904b into dotnet:main Jun 22, 2022
@SingleAccretion SingleAccretion deleted the Delete-Implicit-ByRef-Quirk branch June 22, 2022 14:16
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 22, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants