Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add feature to convert from an explicitly typed lambda to an implicitly typed one. #76770

Merged
merged 148 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025

Conversation

CyrusNajmabadi
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@CyrusNajmabadi CyrusNajmabadi marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2025 01:41
@CyrusNajmabadi CyrusNajmabadi requested a review from a team as a code owner January 16, 2025 01:41
@CyrusNajmabadi
Copy link
Member Author

@JoeRobich @ToddGrun ptal :)

@CyrusNajmabadi
Copy link
Member Author

@JoeRobich @ToddGrun ptal :)

Copy link
Member

@JoeRobich JoeRobich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Do we need to make a work item to ensure the docs are updated?

@CyrusNajmabadi
Copy link
Member Author

LGTM. Do we need to make a work item to ensure the docs are updated?

That happens with a process we've already setup with the docs team.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area-Compilers untriaged Issues and PRs which have not yet been triaged by a lead VSCode
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants